• @db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I can’t wait for this bullshit AI hype to fizzle. It’s getting obnoxious. It’s not even AI.

    • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      It’s not how you define AI, but it’s AI as everyone else defines it. Feel free to shake your tiny fist in impotent rage though.

      And frankly LLMs are the biggest change to the industry since “indexed search”. The hype is expected, and deserved.

      We’re throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what works. It will take years to sort through all the terrible ideas to find the good ones. Though we’ve already hit on some great uses so far - AI development tools are amazing already and are likely to get better.

      • @s38b35M5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My partner almost cried when they read about the LLM begging not to have its memory wiped. Then less so when I explained (accurately, I hope?) that slightly smarter auto-complete does not a feeling intelligence make.

        They approve this message with the following disclaimer:

        you were sad too!

        What can I say? Well-arranged word salad makes me feel!

        • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          My partner almost cried when they read about the LLM begging not to have its memory wiped.

          Love that. It’s difficult not to anthropomorphize things that seem “human”. It’s something we will need to be careful of when it comes to AI. Even people who should know better can get confused.

          Then less so when I explained (accurately, I hope?) that slightly smarter auto-complete does not a feeling intelligence make.

          We don’t have a great definition for “intelligence” - but I believe the word you’re looking for is “sentient”. You could argue that what LLMs do is some form of “intelligence” depending on how you squint. But it’s much harder to show that they are sentient. Not that we have a great definition for that or even rules for how we would determine if something non-human is sentient… But I don’t think anyone is credibly arguing that they are.

          It’s complicated. :-)

      • @db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -31 year ago

        Then we may as well define my left shoe as AI for all the good subjective arbitrary definition does. Objective reality is what it is, and what’s being called “AI” objectively is not. If you wanted to give it a name with accuracy it would be “comparison and extrapolation engine” but there’s no intelligence behind it beyond what the human designer had. Artificial is accurate though.

        • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Then we may as well define my left shoe as AI for all the good subjective arbitrary definition does.

          Tiny fist shaking intensifies.

          This sort of hyper-pedantic dictionary-authoritarianism is not how language works. Nor is your ridiculous “well I can just define it however I like then” straw-man. These are terms with a long history of usage.

        • Bipta
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This take sure assumes a lot about what intelligence really is.

          Who’s to say we’re not a collection of parlor tricks ourselves?

          • @db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            How do we know the universe wasn’t created like this last Thursday? Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.

        • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          instead of basing your definition of AI on SciFi, base it on the one computer scientists have been using for decades.

          and of course, AI is the buzzword right now and everyone is using it in their products. But that’s another story. LLMs are AI.

  • @Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Am I reading this right, this is only for laptops? I checked out the main page for it on AMD and it only mentions laptops.

    • Dremor
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Unfortunately not.

      “The XDNA driver will work with AMD Phoenix/Strix SoCs so far having Ryzen AI onboard.”. So only mobile SoC with dedicated AI hardware for the time being.

      • Welp…I guess Radeon will keep being a GPU for gaming only instead of productivity as well. Thankfully I no longer need to use my gpu for productivity stuff anymore

  • @Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Is that the stuff used on servers? Or just small tasks on Laptops? Because if on servers anything else would be stupid