I do agree that this feeling points to something true, even though it may be hard to define it. I have some half-baked thoughts but im mainly curious to hear what others are thinking of this

  • @Jeffrey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    I believe the greatest factor is community. In my experience wealthier people, and wealthier areas, tend to have less community and weaker interpersonal bonds because they do not depend on one another to the same extent that poorer people do.

    When your neighbor needs to borrow a tool, you need to sleep at a friend’s place, or you give a friend a ride to work you’re building relationships. The web of relationships between all the neighbors in a community forms a culture.

    When people become wealthier they don’t need to borrow tools because they can buy their own, they don’t need to crash at a friend’s place when they can stay in a hotel, and they don’t need a ride to work if they have their own transportation.

    In my experience some of the isolating effects of wealth accumulation can be mitigated with infrastructure that increases the inter-dependence, trust, and fraternity between neighbors. A few examples are walkable cities, cooperative organizations, social clubs, public parks, etc…

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Yes, but these things are mostly hidden to tourists/visitors, so I don’t think this is the relevant factor here.

  • overflow
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    really don’t like when people romanticize poverty but if I had to guess why people say that poorer countries feel more authentic it’s just due to the fact that it’s different to what they’re accustomed to and this could be replicated by just going to the poorer areas in their own country

    • @ksynwa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I think settler colonialism plays some part in it too. For example, cultures that have organically developed over several hundred years as opposed to cultures that have developed over thousands of years. But I haven’t thought about this particular topic much so I could be wrong.

      • @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Absolutely. Colonialism’s biggest goal was to homogenise according to the coloniser culture, by force, genocide, any means. It is intended to erase languages, traditions, and identity before installing their own, so the colonized are easy to control. Just look at how the US, Canada, Australia. New Zealand, and Hawai’i are considered fully white countries, despite white people being there for less than a hundredth of the time human activity has existed in those places.

  • @morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Pretty sure because it’s their lives have not yet been greatly affected by modernity and consumerism

  • erpicht
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    If I were to choose but one thing: car-tailored city planning.

  • @yxzi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    The more development (be it good or bad), the greater the distance to “authenticity”.

    Reproducing authenticity is therefore as (im)possible as undoing the development

  • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    There’s a difference between a store built from wood and a store built from plastic that’s supposed to look like wood. It breathes a feeling of simplicity, and not profit based optimization. It’s something new.

    There’s a sauna I go to with some pretty dumb features, and the entrance fee is way too cheap to be profitable. But I love it because it seems to not be built with profit in mind.