But people in the 90s were doing their work just fine, with that same UX paradigm. What’s the difference now?
Just to be clear, I’m not saying that software’s UI and UX doesn’t need to evolve. But it bothers me that a perfectly usable UI gets criticized only because it’s “old” and doesn’t look “modern” (tf is a “modern UI”, btw?).
The 90s are calling, they want their UX back.
You can change it to ribbon-style in view > user interface of you want
What’s wrong with the 90s UX? It lets you do your work without being intrusive or annoying, so what’s wrong with it?
Sorry but a word processor that doesn’t trigger a 9 second laggy animation with every button press is just simply unusable
deleted by creator
So, the problem is that people doesn’t have a working memory anymore, is that so?
deleted by creator
But people in the 90s were doing their work just fine, with that same UX paradigm. What’s the difference now?
Just to be clear, I’m not saying that software’s UI and UX doesn’t need to evolve. But it bothers me that a perfectly usable UI gets criticized only because it’s “old” and doesn’t look “modern” (tf is a “modern UI”, btw?).
deleted by creator
Instead of thinking of the 90s UI as dated market it as retro and watch hipsters laud it for its classic feel.
Also, there are 7 different UI options to choose from. Maybe try those out and find one that fits you.
With GTK theming, it can look good