• zorro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 years ago

    “You can experience our content better in the app!”

    My brother in Christ, you made the website…

    • gkd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Of course they did. You can collect more data by forcing the user to create an account and circumvent most ad blocks in an app though! What incentive do they have to making a functioning site?!

      • BigT54@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Use a VPN like Mullvad that has an ad block built in. It doesn’t allow ads to load in any apps, it’s really nice. I’m sure they can still collect all kinds of data but at least the ads are taken care of.

        • gkd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yea that’s what I do. Majority of people though are not doing that and they know it.

  • Godnroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 years ago

    Throw one of those bottom-corner “How can I help?” pop ups that makes the tab flash and constantly change the text in there too.

      • frippa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And a poorly-made chatbot answering (with slow loading times!) bonus points if you can’t even get to talk to a human after 20 messages of “that’s not what I wanted” and “let me talk with a bone-and-flesh humanoid”

    • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Netbrain has one that makes a sound. Annoying when you tuck their page in a tab. No site should throw sound out like that.

      • Godnroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s pretty rational; if it was a person being that obnoxious they would be missing teeth from the number of times they got punched in the face.

  • gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    Was raised in an age where where you needed firewalls, antiviruses, spam blocks and ad blocks, Ect to surf the web safety.

    Now companies are doing everything they can to make sure you disable all it to have the privilege of using their website.

    • 257m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Antiviruses were mostly for a false sense of security. They only stop the most basic attacks.

  • tesseract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    People living in EU. You guys are lucky. These cookie banners and stuff behave differently there because EU forces the reject all button

    • CrowAirbrush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Every other website i visit has a different tactic of hiding their reject button.

      They will even give a second pop up leaving you unable to use the website in hopes of you clicking accept anyway.

      • JoJo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Consent-o-matic

        Install once, go to a website, wait a few seconds, ans it rejects all those 1273 “partners” for you, together with clicking every hidden “reject” button, so you don’t have to

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      The EU does definitely not have an easy reject all button…it’s always a minefield to work out how to disable them. Most take over 30-60 seconds to find out how to disable everything

    • heftig@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      That doesn’t seem to be true. A lot of German publishers do not allow you to proceed without giving consent to cookies and profiling for targeted advertising. They consider this legal because they offer you the alternative of “opting out” by signing up for a paid subscription.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not in my experience. The reject all button is usually hidden behind the review your choices button. It’s fucking bullshit. Accept all is always visible tho.

      If I block cookie banners, does that mean I reject cookies because I didn’t consent? Because if that’s the case, I’m gonna just start blocking them.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The EU does force the reject all button, however companies and websites often don’t care about the law; some newspaper in my country straight up ask for a subscription to let you have the privilege of disabling cookies on their ad-ridden dying websites, and many more don’t have a “reject all” button.

      I try to report some of them but who knows if it does something.

      Plus from personal experience; when you setup a GDPR button through Google, by default there is no “reject all” button. Or the equally mandatory “x” to close the popup, thus rejecting cookies. You need to tick a box to enable them.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In 204x will be like

    > visit site

    > Popup: “We’d like to introduce you to our own Terms of Service.”

    > Popup: "And also these random terms regarding global rights

    > Popup: “And minorities”

    > Popup: “And countries who need YOUR help!”

    > Popup: “No really, we really mean it.”

    > Popup: “And also regarding telemetry”

    > Popup: “And on how we will fetch private/sensitive about you without your concern.”

    > Popup: “Also some things we’ve got from third parties about you”

    > Popup: “Oh yeah! Would you like to buy these random stuff we think its fitting for YOU?”

    etc.

    • pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      By that time the websites will use LLMs to weave all that shit into the articles you read. Perfecting the method of ever so slowly conditioning you after the vision of some coked up marketing exec marketing algorithm’s personalised hellhole, based on your very private and personal desires.
      The average user will read about yet another school shooting and leave the article wishing for a delicious and refreshing coke to wash down the bad taste in their mouth, like only real coca cola can, which is now improved in flavour and available in a refrigeration section near your habitat. Because when the world let’s you down, coca cola will pick you up!

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes, but imagine what we had to deal with during the 90s dot-com boom before someone created a pop-up blocker. It was absolutely hellish.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    I get why soulless corporations do this, but why do regular folks choose to publish their content on Medium, Substack, Devto, etc. when this is the shitty UX they’ll be forcing on their readers.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Speaking of technical stuff… same criticism go towards Microsoft GitHub. Unnecessary social features, search doesn’t work if you’re not authenticated, can’t participate without an account, stuffed with upsells (with the latest being an ad for Microsoft GitHub copilot inside the code view), where the Copilot product is sold back to the users who worked (often for free) to create the code to train it, pushes to use Sponsors so Microsoft can take their cut of donations, custom proprietary Markdown fork that isn’t compatible with other platforms …and to top it off, the pull request model straight-up doesn’t scale for a lot of projects but it’s the only option unless the maintainers consciously decide to host another tool or mailing list outside the Microsoft GitHub forge which defeats the point of even using the code forge product.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        There are options outside the ones with heavy marketing departments to host writing. There was a time when hosting your own website was easy/normal. It still is easy (tho requirements like TLS certificates & fail2ban have raised some barrier to entry) & there are tools that automate the process now more than then, but there is an intimidation factor that really needs to be knocked down. The only other barrier has been folks living in places where symmetric internet isn’t the norm & you are expected to be a consumer & not a producer (this also needs to be fixed since it doesn’t cost more to send bits in the other direction).

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Self-host a static build system (Soupault is my preferred tool for this). If no to self-hosting, static hosting can be found cheap or ‘free’ in many spaces.

        If building static files is too complicated, or more social features are desired WriteFreely & Plume operate on the fediverse (like Lemmy) or something like Movim (XMPP powered) can host anything from blogs video conferencing with other social features. I hear some folks like Bear, but I have no experience with it. They all have the advantage of being self-hostable too (but be warned, all of these listed source code is being hosted on the proprietary Microsoft GitHub which will require an account & agreeing to their ToS to interact with & any source code contributions will be fed through Microsoft GitHub’s Copilot AI models to be sold back at developers).

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    More patience than me. I don’t make it past Frame 2 unless I can keep scrolling, or there’s a ‘Reject All’ button. If anything else pops up, too many ads in the scroll, or paragraph three still says fuck all, I’m out

    • stebo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I always just reject cookies but if they start whining about adblock I’m out (apparently even when it’s YouTube)

      • BigT54@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was trying to read an article the other day and they had a reject all cookies button. When this is an option I always use it but this one redirected me to a page that told me they won’t let me view their articles if I don’t let them track me. It went on to talk about some bullshit sob story about how it’s the only way they can be profitable and that they pinky promise to be responsible with the data collected.

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Newsletters and notifications – two things I have never, ever once allowed.

    STOP ASKING

  • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Now you can add:

    • disable ad blocker to continue
    • set your tracking preference that we’ll forget next visit, but you can’t read until you click it, ok?
    • a video clip with ads playing in banner on top, which plays audio without your permission - then pops up the window just below as you scroll, blocking half the text

    Ive been doing this dance for 30 years. From pop under popup windows in the 90s, adobe flash ads, Java script… and the list just keeps going. I have never bought something, from a web advert that was obnoxious. Google was the only place I willingly allowed ads back in early 2000s; that simple text box on the right with almost relevant adverts to my search. I bought from one of those, once.

  • Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There were a few years without any popups at all. This directly caused the 2008 recession due to people not receiving newsletters.