• SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Not things like this, this exactly. He’s the trust fund baby of an apartheid era emerald mine baron.

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You might be thinking that getting an x-ray every day is bad for the miners, but this is a ye-olde look through machine. Yes it’s bad for the miners, but the guy looking at it is putting his face and uppee body right in the beam here. And I’m guessing he does hundreds of these a day.

    Then again, old timey x-ray machines were pretty soft, so (edit) AND the miner is getting big dose of alpha and beta radiation too. And at least the technician isn’t breathing coal dust, so it’s probably a toss up who gets cancers first.

    • @logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5611 months ago

      Both people in this picture are being abused by the company. The difference is that the company also lets the white guy abuse the black guy, and for that reason, the white guy feels superior.

      This is one of those things you see in fascist governments. As long as people are able to abuse someone, they’ll accept a much worse station as well as a lot of abuse themselves.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      3011 months ago

      @Tar_alcaran … if the miners even lived long enough to get cancer.

      Diamond miners during Apartheid were working in unsafe conditions for ridiculously low wages, often coerced into being there, and at relatively high risk of tuberculosis.

    • @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      but the guy looking at it is putting his face and uppee body right in the beam here

      Ah, but he’s wearing gloves, so he’ll be fine.

    • @TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      X-ray tubes, old and new, use high energy electrons that impact a metal to create the beam. Alpha and beta emission is from radioactive decay which is an entirely different phenomenon. But yes bathing your body in X-rays is bad for you

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Sorry, I had a brainfart there. You’re completely right.

        The tube itself emits xrays, but soft xrays have a very high chance of being absorbed by Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen. And since that’s mostly what makes up a human, that’s kinda bad.

        Also he’s digging up diamonds, which is in rocks full of radioactive materials. Diamond mine tailings are famously radioactive (and interesting) due all the thorium and radium in them.

  • @UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7611 months ago

    This looks like a fluoroscope, basically an X-ray that is constantly turned on. The tech is looking at a live X-ray view, not a film transparency.

    The radiologic exposure for both of them is orders of magnitude higher than a normal x-ray that we think about. A normal xray exposes you for less than a second, this is bombarding him with X-rays the entire time he is standing there.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7211 months ago

    Wow this machine can also detect cancers of you use it long enough.

  • @notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5911 months ago

    You know we still xray people at diamond mines here in South Africa. Try visiting a De Beers mine and see for yourself.

    • @can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3311 months ago

      Try visiting a De Beers mine and see for yourself.

      I’m depressed enough as it is thank you.

    • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2711 months ago

      Daily x-rays… Seems like that won’t have any impact to long term survival.

      What a humane way to prevent theft.

      • @Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 months ago

        Yeah, I was wondering whether this was worse for the miners or the examiner. I’m sure that today modern technology protects the examiner more thoroughly and that they still don’t care about the miners. But I could be wrong. Maybe they don’t care about the examiner either.

        • @UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          My grandfather died in his 50s likely due to constant exposure from industrial xrays in the 50s and 60s. He was a college educated white guy in the US, so I’m guessing they give even fewer fucks about these guys.

          • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            I’m sorry for your loss.

            This is the reason why you can only get so many medical scans per year, to limit exposure. I’m sure the corporations who are running the equipment for non-medical reasons couldn’t give less of a shit, since caring doesn’t usually drive profits.

            It’s truly horrendous and should have never been allowed.

    • PugJesusM
      link
      fedilink
      2111 months ago

      Really? Jesus. I would have expected such a thing to have long died out.

  • @TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3211 months ago

    I do wonder whether this was actually an effective way to look for them. Even with modern high resolution x-ray imaging it may be difficult to see the contrast between soft tissues and diamonds since they’re both primarily carbon

    bones show up well since they’re high in calcium, which has a much higher atomic number. Same with gold.

  • @mvuviA
    link
    English
    2411 months ago

    Galton introduced fingerprinting in South Africa as an experiment after Indians introduced it to him. Managing miners using fingerprints was one of those moments capitalism and colonialism converged on science and technology and shaped the global sector we now call identification.

    For more, read The Biometric State by Keith Breckinridge.