The trevors are named trevor.
“Their names are both Trevor” would sound the most unambiguous to me.
Both correct, it depends whether you are saying,1 “They both have names and their names are Trevor” or “They both have the same name and that name is Trevor”.
So the real question is are you talking about their shared name or both of their names separately?
Them be Trevors
This is the one grammatically acceptable time to use Thar
Trevor’re their names.
They’re named Trevor.
“They’re both named Trevor.”
Both their names are Trevor
When would you use both their vs both of their in this scenario? Your’s makes sense but I would have put an of, and I’m wondering if it’s just a waste of letters.
Both are valid. One might be more likely to feel more natural to say depending on where that person is from or how they were taught, that’s it.
These are our Trevors.
We are all Trevor
On this blessed day
Speak for yourself
I am all Trevor
“Their names are Trevor.”
You could use some Irish English, then you could be saying “Themmuns are called Trevor” that way there’s zero ambiguity
A lot of posts but no-one has yet to say.
They’re named Trevors
Clears the whole thing up.
“Their names are Trevor and Also-Trevor”.
I present: THE TREVORS
As somebody who worked in a place with 5 Dougs, I would say their names are Doug. Beyond that, they get descriptors. Angry Doug, Cool Doug, Vac-Former Doug, Smiley Doug, and Doug 2.
Doug
DougDoug
DougDougDoug
DougDougDougDoug
Douglas
