Trevor’re their names.
They’re named Trevor.
“They’re both named Trevor.”
We are all Trevor
On this blessed day
Speak for yourself
I am all Trevor
“Their names are Trevor.”
Them be Trevors
This is the one grammatically acceptable time to use Thar
“Their names are both Trevor” would sound the most unambiguous to me.
Both their names are Trevor
These are our Trevors.
When would you use both their vs both of their in this scenario? Your’s makes sense but I would have put an of, and I’m wondering if it’s just a waste of letters.
Both are valid. One might be more likely to feel more natural to say depending on where that person is from or how they were taught, that’s it.
You could use some Irish English, then you could be saying “Themmuns are called Trevor” that way there’s zero ambiguity
“Their names are Trevor and Also-Trevor”.
As somebody who worked in a place with 5 Dougs, I would say their names are Doug. Beyond that, they get descriptors. Angry Doug, Cool Doug, Vac-Former Doug, Smiley Doug, and Doug 2.
Doug
DougDoug
DougDougDoug
DougDougDougDoug
Douglas
I present: THE TREVORS
A lot of posts but no-one has yet to say.
They’re named Trevors
Clears the whole thing up.
And Trevor is his name-o
The sentence that comes to mind is “both of their names are Trevor.”
For your question, this conveniently reduces to “their names are Trevor.”
So there’s your answer.
