• Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is there a real world example of the bourgeois specifically calling revolutionairies authoritarian, or is that limited to theory?

    • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cuba, China, Vietnam, USSR, DPRK, Soviet Afghanistan (The one where women weren’t slaves, which the US overthrew in favour of poppy-growing pedophiles), East Germany, Nelson Mandela, Venezuela, Chile, the list goes on. Similarly: Countries that do not have governments, they have “regimes”. They do not have Vice-presidents or deputies, they have “hand-picked successors”.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those are governments/countries and not at all what I’m talking about. I’m talking about an organization of people attempting a revolution on their own government.

          • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Define what you mean by anarchist, because we may have very different definitions of the word.

            When I say anarchist, I mean those who believe in the philosophical ideals of anarchism, which could manifest in many different forms, but all have one common thread, being having the ideal of the abolition of heirarchy in society (which makes something like AnCap not anarchy despite its name).