A few years ago anything you wanted to search for would generate hundreds of pages of results. From sources all over. If you structured your query well you could dramatically cut down the irrelevant results and then spend a bit of time skimming through the offerings until you found your target.

Searching felt like a hunt, it could take you to far flung corners of the web, and hitting the jackpot on some obscure forum was part of the fun.

Now searching anything feels incredibly frustrating. You know what you are looking for is out there somewhere but it feels impossible getting to it. Basically we have only two main routes now, Google and Bing (and I swear Bing is just copying Google’s homework). I’ve tried a handful of others and they all fall very short.

Something has changed dramatically under the hood.

It seems like the results are very shallow and no amount of prodding will get either search engine to produce anything besides the laziest output. Any subject has a limited pool of sites they lean on and then pretend that that’s all of the Internet.

It generalizes very quickly and if you try to counter by putting things in quotations it gives up.

Even in the rare moments I’ve buckled and used their stupid AI, it takes even more time browbeating the program to just deliver the damned specifics.

What is going on??

How do we get our old search back?

I swear every day of trying to navigate the web feels worse than the day before.

How did we get here?

There’s got to be something better, right? Or something we can do to pave a new structure that benefits the denizens of the web better than the lazy slop our tech overlords scrape off the table for us. What can we do?

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    SEO. Everybody is blaming corporations but nobody today can develop a search engine that can’t be spammed. If they could, they would.

    • MrOtingocni@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If only we (the collective users) spent more time creating a framework and vision of how the Internet should develop and aggressively pushed back on attempts to deviate from it…

      When the people refuse to convene a governing body with teeth, the vacuum is filled with opportunists.

      In a sense we are suffering from our own success. A place where anybody can build anything they want digitally. Left a ripe field for unrestrained commercial interests to infest the whole thing. Now it is bloated with human and AI slop to such a degree it smothers everything else and every major tech push is tuned towards data scraping every morsel.

    • Salty_NZ@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      True, but that reeks of victim blaming. The spammers are to blame here, not the mathematical inevitability of antispammers being behind on the arms race. Also, fucking AI.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    People with bad info put more effort into SEO than people with good info. Google changing focus from getting people good results to getting people to stay on their site. Powers that be filling the web with misinformation. There’s always been conspiracies and misinformation on the internet, but now there’s major money in pushing it.

  • blackbrook@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There are leaked emails from Google (from many years ago) where it was proposed to purposely degrade search quality to increase ad clicks. While some at Google responded with dismay as this, it is not a great leap to assume that this faction eventually won and they did in fact deliberately do that. Advertising is Google’s main revenue source, they are clearly motivated to do so.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ever since the deployment of machine generated results for search engines, there has always been a competition between the search engines and various others using search engine optimization to get to the top of the results. It isn’t worth it for Alphabet or Microsoft to fix their search engines if they can push you to AI, so their non-AI results naturally degrade.

  • Lonk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think they intentionally made search engines worse to push people into using LLM’s

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They already are dogshit.

        If your LLM prompt isn’t about something common or mainstream is has an incorrect response most of the time. Unfortunately due to how they work, they will present the incorrect answers with the same confidence as correct answers.

        LLMs seem like their only use is writing reports or resumes that no one needs to read. Everything else is better done by hand.

  • steve_freiheit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve been using metasearch engines (engines that pass your query to multiple search engines so you can aggregate them easily) and the two I’ve been using were pretty good in my experience. 4get.ca and degoog.org.

  • iusemybrain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Because data is never free. Google, duckduckgo, kagi, they all cost money one way or another whether that be a subscription service or by forcing websites to be shit so your only option is using their LLMs. Yes the reason why the internet has gone to shit is because of LLMs

    I’ve went through hundreds of search results on duckduckgo, even when I make it intentionally broad and genetic that wikipedia would cover it, it still doesn’t come as the first search result. Search engines have gone to shit because LLMs make the most money in terms of data surveillance. Meaning (take for example google) they have a profile of you, they have queries to train, they have data that can be sold to advertisers. The only reason LLMs are being pushed so much isn’t because its intelligent, it’s because it makes the most money.

    There is a “search engine” that hasn’t gone to shit, and that’s called marginalia search, It’s not exactly a search engine where you can type a url and it will bring you to a page, Instead it compliments your general search engine as a research aid and you can find some golden sites.

    I’ve personally used it for data sheets on IC electronics and their implementations. Unfortunately I’ve found it insufferably difficult on duckduckgo (like multiple pages deep for a datasheet, something that should pop up on the first page), and I don’t trust the output of LLMs (large lying models).

    So yea, hopefully this helps.

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    21 hours ago

    SEO did this. It started before LLM and chatGPT. Blogger make money be generating trafic. So they wrote shits in a format that please search engine.

    That’s why if you search “search into file Linux”, instead of just a grep command line, you end up on 2000 lines article with introduction, paragraph, explanation, blablabla. Because search engine boost this kind of content. Title, introduction paragraph that repeat the title, subsections, etc…

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ve never seen any search engine officially confirm this, but search across all search engines became terrible just a few months after the release of ChatGPT.
    Which is why my assumption is that LLMs are being used to generate heaps of credible-looking, but ultimately worthless webpages. And search engines have to try to filter those out or their results would be even worse.

    But then there’s no obvious distinction between a human-crafted blog and some spam webpage, which means the human-crafted blog is likely to be caught in the crossfire and get filtered as well.

    Well, and on top of that, search engines presumably got hit by AI scrapers looking for training data, so that’s why I would assume, they now limit the search results to one page…

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah. Noticed this too. Pages that look legit but are filled with useless word salad that doesn’t go anywhere.

      Gives you an impression that those pages didn’t exist before your search. How it got to top results is beyond me.

  • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You might try to give one of the alternative search providers a try. There’s duck duck go for the USA, and Qwant for the EU.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Because the AI hallucinations are pushed ahead of traditional search engine results?

    This evening I was repairing something. My google search gave an AI summary that gave two important dimensions of a part I needed. I was like “OK let’s go eat”

    Two hours later, because I didn’t write anything down, I entered the same search verbatim and got a different AI summary missing one of the dimensions.

    We have made computing non-deterministic. We’re busy giving sentience to refrigerators that can’t keep ice cream frozen.