• GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Knight First Amendment Institute argued as amicus that searching expressive and associational content on phones demands a First Amendment warrant. The Second Circuit rejected that argument, holding that neither the Fourth nor the First Amendment carves out a special exemption for phones at the border.

    Wow. Yeah… We all need shitty travel phones with very little on them now. That’s fucking gross.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or don’t travel with a phone at all. Take a digital camera and use that for pictures.

      Anything else, just buy a used phone at your destination and load all your accounts on that, then delete and reset your phone and sell it before you leave

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Take a digital camera and use that for pictures.

        They’ll search that too! Take an analog camera instead. At least that way you get the film developed for free ;).

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Second Circuit rejected that argument, holding that neither the Fourth nor the First Amendment carves out a special exemption for phones at the border.

      Could it be because the technology was still 250 fucking years away?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      We all need shitty travel phones with very little on them now.

      Or don’t travel there.