MadeInDex 📰🌎@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoZuckerberg's Pervert Glasses Have Been So Publicly Shamed That Meta's Reportedly Now Working on a Version With No Camerafuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1290arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1284arrow-down1external-linkZuckerberg's Pervert Glasses Have Been So Publicly Shamed That Meta's Reportedly Now Working on a Version With No Camerafuturism.comMadeInDex 📰🌎@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square42linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSéimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up74·edit-21 day agoThis is still surveillance, just with audio instead of video. But this actually creates a new problem: wearers of pervert glasses have plausible deniability. “Are you filming me?” “Who, me? Oh no, these ones don’t have cameras. Trust me”.
minus-squareGrostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 day agoYep, it’s just meant to muddy the waters. Pretty common tactic, especially from these big tech companies.
minus-squareslevinkelevra@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoI think the new problem is exactly what they want to achieve.
This is still surveillance, just with audio instead of video.
But this actually creates a new problem: wearers of pervert glasses have plausible deniability. “Are you filming me?” “Who, me? Oh no, these ones don’t have cameras. Trust me”.
Yep, it’s just meant to muddy the waters. Pretty common tactic, especially from these big tech companies.
I think the new problem is exactly what they want to achieve.
I think so too.