• arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    Why do you need glasses at all for a version with no camera? Can’t someone just wear earbuds in that case? Can’t someone’s regular bluetooth (or even tethered) earbuds just talk to the phone in their pocket to do everything?

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    “Oh, don’t worry, these are actually the Meta Glasses Freedom©®™. They’re actually pretty innovative! I can go off-grid while still feeling so connected to all my feeds! Instead of recording to the cloud, I can use my new Freedoms©®™ to record moments directly to my brain using the new Facebook BAM technology. Yup, these babies don’t have a single semiconductor, but Zuck still managed to somehow run Brain Access Memory on them! The best part is how cheap they are! Nearly half the price, and you get a 10% discount on their AI subscription since these glasses don’t actually transfer any data. But that subscription lets the Meta Glasses Freedom©®™ assist me with directly accessing memories whether the glasses were present or not! It’s a pretty sweet deal, if you really think about it.”

  • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My favourite part of this is that Zuck was so out of ideas that he tried to reinvent Google Glass at great expense and is running into exactly the same social brick wall that project did.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      To be fair, people have become more stupid / subservient, to the point I can see why someone would think “let’s try that again”.

    • BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not unless your normal glasses do all this: “The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones to allow users to speak to the company’s AI chatbot and its recently-released AI assistant, called Muse. They’ll presumably pick up audio from users’ environments as well, where bystanders may not be aware of the eavesdropping.”

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How does this beat a glasses and earphone combo. You take the glasses off but still enjoy the use of the earphones that way.

  • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This is still surveillance, just with audio instead of video.

    But this actually creates a new problem: wearers of pervert glasses have plausible deniability. “Are you filming me?” “Who, me? Oh no, these ones don’t have cameras. Trust me”.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So your telling me I can go into a mirror maze and not be so nervous? Psh, finally found a use case. Wait how much are they?.. nevermind

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    To be fair, this is not that different from the always-on, always-listening phones in everyone’s hands now.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        In what way?

        Are we assuming that phones aren’t listening all the time and glasses are?

        Or that you can theoretically turn off always listening on phones but not on glasses?

        Or that the phones are Apple / Google / Samsung, etc, but the glasses are Meta, so that’s different?

        Or just that phones are already out of the barn, and one listening device per person is bad enough, but glasses we will have a chance to regulate with common sense data privacy laws?

        • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I mean, your phone isn’t constantly pointing his cameras at other people’s face and using meta’s database to gather information on the people you’re filming, that’s already a big difference.

          Then you have different options to deGAFAM your phones. I personalky use graphene but I get most people are not there yet.

          Don’t get me wrong, phones are obviously the most common spying devices out there, but jt’s definitely not to the level of these dystopian glasses.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That is a good point about having graphene as an option on some phones.

            I was talking about the version of the glasses that will be sold without cameras.