cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52022727

Looks like everyone who raised awareness about “Mark Zuckerberg Pervert Glasses” ultimately made a real difference <3

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones […]

    So the glasses will still record innocent bystanders without consent, only without video? That’s not much better. The shaming will and should continue.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.

      Should we shame people with phones if their phone has a microphone?

      • redrum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.

        Where? In my country (Spain) has never been prohibited in public spaces, except in recent years that record the police has been forbidden. ACAB

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Point being that you didn’t need to ask for consent before any more than now. It might be illegal, but who cares, really?

          Over here it’s legal to record any conversation you are a part of or can “reasonably hear”. So no parabolic shotgun mics allowed 😀

        • lauha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          In Finland you are always allowed to record conversations you take part in. Law limits what you can use it for though.

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        In the US that varies by state. California is “two party consent” so you need permission. If you just mean you can do it illegally, tape recorders have been around since way before the 1980s.

        In some countries the camera apps on phones are required to make a shutter noise when you take a picture so it’s harder to do secretly.

      • onlooker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, we shouldn’t shame people for using a device that happens to have a microphone. But we absolutely should shame people who knowingly and flagrantly use recording devices with a complete disregard to other people’s privacy.

  • Blibly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    So now you can buy the pervert glasses and all the public hatred without even getting to be a pervert. Genius.

  • Mo.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or they found a way to hide the camera from the users and now you’re grabbing video that you don’t have access to or even know about. Check out the matte black lens covers that are essentially just windows from one side.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had a showerthought about the incident with the gym manager wearing pervglasses - what if it was all kept on a central server, no user access with ~2 week deletion, it’s just an employee-worn security camera.

    But then I thought, Deus Ex wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual.