This same argument can be extended to literally any technology developed under capitalism which is what makes it nonsensical. The focus on technology is deeply misguided because this is fundamentally a social problem.
Hard disagree. Even if AI was developed in a hypothetical utopian communist state, the ethical, artistic and especially environmental concerns would still be legitimate reasons to be anti AI.
If someone is against ai and they do it for reasons other than socialism, that’s a win in my book.
What’s legitimate is inherently subjective. Yet, what we do see objectively is that people living in a socialist society overwhelmingly welcome this technology.
This same argument can be extended to literally any technology developed under capitalism which is what makes it nonsensical. The focus on technology is deeply misguided because this is fundamentally a social problem.
Hard disagree. Even if AI was developed in a hypothetical utopian communist state, the ethical, artistic and especially environmental concerns would still be legitimate reasons to be anti AI.
If someone is against ai and they do it for reasons other than socialism, that’s a win in my book.
What’s legitimate is inherently subjective. Yet, what we do see objectively is that people living in a socialist society overwhelmingly welcome this technology.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/world/china-ai-nepal-tibet-flood.html
Gross.
Ah yes, my western chauvinist opinions are the only right ones.
You’re trying to say AI is a good thing. That’s gross.
Have you considered that I don’t really care what some ignoramus on the internet thinks?
At least I don’t have to get a robot owned by the oligarchs to think for me.
That sentence clearly indicates that there isn’t much thinking going on in your head to begin with.