URL for the crowdfunding: https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/open-book-touch

Specs:

  • Display: 4.26" e-paper touchscreen, 480 × 800 px, warm + cool frontlight
  • Processor: ESP32-S3 dual-core, Wi-Fi + Bluetooth LE
  • Memory: 16 MB flash, 8 MB PSRAM
  • Formats: EPUB and plain text, no DRM
  • Storage: microSD card slot
  • Interface: USB-C with integrated LiPo charging
  • Dimension: 78 × 120 × 10 mm, about 85 g
  • Open source: MIT-licensed firmware, open hardware (to be released at shipping)

It also has a replaceable 800 mAh battery, I found it cool :)

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The specs are an absolute joke. Even my Sony PRS from 2008 comes with 64MB RAM and physical buttons.

    This thing will choke on epubs with embedded fonts, if it doesn’t just plainly ignore them (which it seems like it will, since they’re talking so much about their own custom font).

    Neat idea, but I fear it’s destined to fail. I also think it’s too small. The PRS-505 is six inches and I wouldn’t go any smaller than that for comfortable reading.

  • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    MIT licenced firmware… Another bunch of libertarian kids who don’t know better.

    Like they don’t know everyone likes buttons, specially page turn buttons,

    • onwardknave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I only vaguely remember hearing nerds debating between the GPL licenses and MIT, way back when…What makes the MIT license libertarian?

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    22 hours ago

    4" screen and 16MB flash is a joke. Ebooks are small, but not that small. Considering how many used, end of life Kindles there are out there stuck on old easily jailbroken firmware, I don’t see why anyone would ever choose this as an alternative. The software for jailbroken Kindles is incredibly mature and at the point of “just works”. E-ink technology hasn’t progressed much in the past ten years, so you really don’t miss out on anything by buying a $30 used one.

    Edit: just realized it has micro SD support. So my storage concerns are invalid. It’s still incredibly clunky looking though, a 1cm thick device with only a 4" screen sure is something. My eyes probably couldn’t handle it even with the largest font.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      To be fair, eBooks have just gotten that big in recent years because the publishers are lazy and cram uncompressed embedded fonts into them.

      I always strip out embedded fonts from my eBooks with calibre and I have seen books being reduced from 20MB to 400KB. 🤣

      This won’t make this a good device due to a myriad of other reasons, though.

    • noodles@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, definitely think there are use cases for this (look at how popular the xeink X4 has gotten), but a device smaller in most dimensions than modern smartphones isn’t gonna make a good general purpose ereader for many people

    • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This. I don’t see why “no buttons” is supposed to be appealing? I’d much prefer only buttons, no touchscreen.

  • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t be cheap being a crowdfunded product, but not expensive either. The biggest turn-away I can see is the small screen. Most e-ink readers nowadays start at 6". A 4.x" screen will lose a considerable chunk of potential backers.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      while it’s nice, i’d argue e-readers use so little battery that even the default should last for at least a decade, but having it is awesome for sure.

    • flux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      ESP32-S3 seems rather properly sized computing power -wise for this kind of device. And it’s quite low-power as well.

      Granted there are some tasks where even this kind device could use some computing, like extracting, indexing and rendering pdfs.

  • traingovroom[He/Him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Generally great idea, but the screen size invalidates it for me. Hope they’re successful enough to launch a 2nd round with a 6"+ screen