Meta pushed a WhatsApp update that replaces the soccer ball ⚽ with the FIFA corruption cup soccer ball by Adidas

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because most of the world is already on WhatsApp, and changing to Signal would isolate you from most people and businesses.

      • nickiam2@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        The only people that believe I’m worth contacting have already switched to Signal and the ones that refused to switch lost contact with me. Their loss I guess.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        changing to Signal would isolate you from most people and businesses.

        Sounds great - if I wasn’t already using Signal, that just might persuade me 😁

      • Zeoic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        Must be more popular in your country, in Canada I don’t know a single person on whatsapp

        • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s very big in western Europe. Here in the Netherlands everybody is on WhatsApp pretty much since it’s creation

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              never heard anyone use whatsapp in sweden, everyone is expected to use something that supports sms as a fallback. Usually facebook messenger or whatever the iphone thing is called.

              Far as i know the only popular truly separate platform would be something like snapchat or kik or whatever, which is used by teenagers.

        • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yeah they’re all on Facebook Messenger which sucks. I’ve managed to switch a few in my surroundings to Signal but I still need to keep Messenger for holdouts.

          • Zeoic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            Thankfully I have managed to get everyone to switch from Messenger to Signal, atleast for talking to me haha. Two other family members being privacy oriented too really helped getting the rest of the family moved over.

    • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I could move to Signal, open up a chat with myself and chat for a while but I think it would get pretty boring pretty soon.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 days ago

      I thought people on here of all places would understand the impact of the network effect.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Because in my country historically the telecom companies are charging 0.30€ per SMS (text) and 2€ per MMS (text with photo).

      So WhatsApp when they launched with their “1€/lifetime” offer on the iPhone 3GS they were the right app at the right time and became the de facto replacement for any kind of messaging. It’s insane how basically overnight they replaced msn messenger and Skype because it was so convenient (Microsoft never did a smartphone client for msn messenger, only unofficial ones. It was available on dumbphones but it used SMS from the plan to send/receive, nobody used it because you needed to be a millionaire to afford it)

      SMS now in my country is only for receiving OTP codes, for the rest is WhatsApp, because still in 2026 the telecoms are still charging 2€ for each MMS sent and nobody wants to risk huge bills. This includes iMessage because if a chat suddenly goes green and you didn’t notice, it costs dozens of euro

      • colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        iMessage because if a chat suddenly goes green and you didn’t notice, it costs dozens of euro

        There’s a setting in iOS to disable that from happening btw

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          The problem is that everyone assumes you have WhatsApp.

          You take clothes to the laundry? The “your order is done” notification is sent via WhatsApp

          Any kind of work stuff is also on WhatsApp

          You order food delivery? WhatsApp

          Amazon started to send delivery notifications via WhatsApp instead of email/sms

          And luckily meta is charging businesses 5 cents for messages via API or otherwise even otp codes would be via whatsapp

          At least here, being reachable only on signal means being a digital exile

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Couldn’t be me… but some people don’t care that Meta can read their messages. Or they still don’t know but I doubt it.

      Mark Zuckerberg has a term for these people…

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      I know we’re all saying network effects, but I don’t know what the fuck network effects means.

      Network effects dude. Network effects.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        It’s a simple concept.

        You need at least 2 people to form a conversation.

        One of them has Whatsapp, Telegram, signal, MSTeams, smoke signals and those flags that ships used to communicate.

        The other only has Whatsapp.

        They are going to communicate over Whatsapp.

        Even if the dude with 1000 communication methods meets another dude with 1000 communication methods, they are going to use WhatsApp, because they are used to using Whatsapp with everyone, so it’s just easier to have everyone on WhatsApp.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          those flags that ships used to communicate.

          i think those are called semaphore and they’re cool as hell. i have a set of flags around here somewhere

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            Of course the random dude I replied to on Lemmy owns a set of semaphore flags. What else would I expect?

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              oh, my wife and i are [mode of communication] geeks. she knows 3 different sign languages, i know a really rare one, we both speak just enough of like 17 different languages to order food and find the library and bathroom wherever we go. Also in semaphore. Partly because we sing, partly because we like people. The first time you learn a new language it changes the way you think about the world just by giving you new words and structures to place those words. It’s beautiful.

    • voodooattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Because it’s unfair to assume that everyone has the necessary education or awareness of what the internet is and what online privacy means that we take for granted.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 days ago

    Dammmmn, that’s an ugly ball. Let’s call it the Curseball Games insted.

    (Fun thing: The football you usually see in emojis is also based on an official World Cup ball, but at least that one’s a classic for a reason. Looks distinctive. Looks cool. Can’t say the same for most of the recent ones, it’s all a blur to me!)

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    As someone that knows nothing about sports what an I even looking at here and why are people upset about it? All I see are balls and ball accessories.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s about a hunnert billionaires banding together…c’mon we can take 'em all down! Let’s Robin Hood all those motherfuckers!

  • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Consume the ads like a good corpo-drone. Lobby the unicode consortium to have your emoji added/removed because you have no control over your computer; you have no property. Drone does what the computer says to do. Consume ads. Beep bop.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Technically it’s not even an emoji

      Emojis are a standard defined by Unicode Consortium