that’s a truck so it needs a truckburetor, not a carburetor
This goes into my box of dad jokes!
Smack the fuel tank half a dozen times with a sledge hammer, the fuel filter is probably clogged.
Can confirm, I just did this yesterday.
Don’t do this. If you unclog the filter the next stop for the junk you knocked loose is the engine.
Fuel filters are cheap and easy to replace.
Fuel filter indeed is not cheap or easy to replace, not on a 96 Sonoma anyways. You either gotta drop the tank, or remove the pickup bed, to access the fuel pump, where the primary fuel sock filter is located.
Not easy or cheap to replace.
Nah fam, you just need a big hole saw! Permanent easy access through the bed :p
And makes your car go faster
There should be two filters, the sock on the fuel sending unit in the tank, and a real filter between the tank and the engine. If your pump and sock are 30 years old its time to get a loaded sending unit from AutoZone
Yeah, we don’t know for sure, but if I had to guess, it’s probably the original fuel pump and filter sock. The truck has just over 200k miles on it.
Considering how old it is, it still purrs like a really big cat, but the other day it crapped out on us and simply refused to start. I verified the fuel pump was working and also verified good hot spark coming from the coil pack, but still it refused to start anymore.
Puzzled I was, so we called a friend, and he was a bit puzzled too, but that’s when he suggested taking a hammer to the bottom of the gas tank, to try to dislodge any crud. Well, we happen to have a sledgehammer, usually just used as a prop stick for the toolbox, but I smacked the bottom of the tank about 6 times (I didn’t even smack it hard), and it started right up 👍
Another commenter suggested a rubber mallet, which I actually do have, and that’ll be going into the truck toolbox later today. As far as replacing the pump/sock assembly, well I won’t be able to do that myself out at our apartment, as it requires either dropping the tank or removing the truck bed first, so that’ll have to be done at a shop someday whenever we have the extra money, whatever the fuck extra money is…
You’re a nicer neighbor than me, I’d drop that tank and replace the sender and stamps in my parking space.
Even if I had all the tools and equipment to drop the tank, they ain’t gonna let me do that at the apartment, my friend would end up getting evicted…
My apologies if you have a fucky 80s era GM product.
In MOST cars, a fuel filter is easy.
Not 80s, it’s a 96. Runs pretty nice no less… Except…
To replace the fuel filter sock requires either dropping the tank or removing the pickup bed. Neither option am I equipped for…
Been a while, but this can also work on the starter. Just a suggestion, keep the hammer weight under 2lbs.
Preferably with a rubber head
Oh shit, 1000%!
You just reminded me that I have a rubber mallet, that needs to go in the truck…
I had 82 Chevy Malibu station wagon in the early 90s while in college. The thing would start like a champion on the second turn, NEVER the first.
Which was fine except the contacts on the solenoid started sticking when it was below freezing. It would sit there and run the battery down unless you jumped out reached underneath with something heavy to knock the solenoid loose… Get back, now being the second try, it would immediately start like a champ…
Did that for 3 months before I finally changed the starter.
Kept a hammer in the passenger footwell of my '89 Volvo wagon for exactly this reason.
No start? Pop the hood, and pop the starter.
I feel knocking the starter with a hammer is a universal 80s driving experience. Like changing the electric distributor contacts mid trip, and using starter spray when the damn thing refuses to turn on again.
Does that actually do anything or is it planned obsolescence? I was under the impression turning off your engine and restarting at a stop wears the starter and it not worth the gas savings. Dealer service centers must be making bank if true.
I don’t think that’s true anymore with modern engines. It’s my understanding that the on / off strain is no longer a limiting factor on engine wear and that the emissions and fuel saving benefits may be mild but are real from a net efficiency standpoint. While emissions savings are probably the greatest, I’m using this primarily to save anything I can with wartime gas prices.
Newer engines use different starter motor technology to reduce starter motor wear and the oil channels are designed to retain oil in the engine where previously there would be a moment of low pressure which you could hear as a slight tinny sound before oil flow.
Source: I’m no mechanic but I’ve dealt in parts for stop-start engines.
Or your points are shot because of that cam you stuffed in the engine and then decided to not go with electronic ignition.
Stop taking pictures of my truck! I’ll get her going again soon…just have to get parts!
My lunati race cam 👁️🫦👁️
It happens to the best of us which is why I now only use Weber or Holley depending on the application
I hate it, I will from now on be one of those guys in an old car. I hate those guys. God dammit
My what?
Let that be a lesson to ya.
(Fuckin’ Quadra-Jets)
