• bizarroland@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, I would recommend waterfox over firefox because waterfox has just straight up removed any AI stuff rather than giving you the option to opt out of it.

        • HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          ~ish, waterfox is reconfigured firefox. They have a single button sync on first launch to clone your firefox data over, it took me like 60 seconds to swap everything over. And you get a lot more than just removing AI from firefox, it’s essentially a preconfigured firefox. Removes a lot of telemetry and analytic stuff, strict-enforces better security protocols, prettier layout and stuff.

          It doesn’t really buy you any new functionality, but it’s way quicker to just use waterfox than it is to spend hours configuring the weird shit like private DNS in firefox.

    • imjustmsk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can maybe try Ladybird (most websites is kinds usable now I guess)

        • imjustmsk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ohh yes, obviously not in the condition to daily drive, and you need to compile from source.

          • HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            ight straight up what is the use case for ladybird? Who do you think is going to “try” it?

            It doesn’t work yet - there’s not really a reason to “use” it unless you’re going to try and develop it