• BlackVenom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    We need a support group for the whiners.

    It’s been dirt cheap and you still don’t have to do it.

    At the end of the day the core of the software is free. They still have to support and develop the clients and services… Go shit on emby or the other one for how unfriendly they are to deal with.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s still hilarious to me that Plex, a project forked from the XBMC (now Kodi) free open-source app for organizing and playing one’s own entirely legally obtained video files, is a big streaming business thing that charges people money.

    It’s like finding a tree in the forest that gives out infinite free apples, and then setting up an apple-selling table right next to it stocked with apples you obviously got from that tree.

  • Piranha Phish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is almost certainly a ploy to get an influx of buyers before the cutoff of July.

    They want to round up all the people that they think were considering a lifetime pass, but were holding out.

    I guarantee you when July comes they’re going to reduce the cost to somewhere less than $750 and much closer to the current price due to “we listen to our customers” when really it was the plan all along.

    They’re using the Decoy Effect and FOMO.

    • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Or maybe they want monthly/annual/whatever subscribers, not lifetime, and so they’re making the lifetime pass prohibitively expensive. I have a lifetime pass I purchased a few years ago but after running Jellyfin alongside Plex for a few months, I don’t think I could recommend Plex to anyone who simply wants to host their own media.

  • dudesss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    As always, donate to the FOSS alternatives instead.

    In the case of Youtube Premium, donate to Ad Blockers instead.

  • Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    One question, lets say that I bought this subscription. What kind of advantages has it, does it cache your media? Or if you have multiple users, you still need to be able to upload media to miltiple users?

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Hmm, perhaps I should sell my lifetime pass. I won’t, but I should. (Switched to Jellyfin long ago)

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What are you hosting jellyfin on? I find it crashes when scanning on my Synology

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I guess it depends on which synology/ size of media collection. I also host jellyfin on a synology (DS923+), in a moderate-sized media collection (~ 9TB) and it never crashed

      • Xanvial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I hosted my jellyfin in Synology DS224+, but I need to upgrade the RAM first, 2GB is not enough for jellyfin, I added 16GB so it has 18GB total now

  • gdtf@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    As if there weren’t enough reasons to use jellyfin already.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t get into self-hosting until recently, and people recommended Jellyfin, so I don’t even know what I’m missing with Plex, if anything. It feels like Jellyfin does everything I need.

      • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You’re missing the early days when plex lifetime pass was ~$50usd and jellyfin wasn’t a thing (that I know of). I believe Kodi was the only real competitor at the time, and it was much less friendly.

        Plex has slowly moved in a less user friendly direction, but still meets my needs and I’ve easily gotten over $750 in value from the…almost 20 years, wow…I’ve been using it.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        79
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re missing getting to pay for it. Imagine how good it would feel to see $750 less in your bank account.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean Plex definitely has a value add. Around here people will scoff but Plex is far easier to work with for non technical users.

          If you shared your library externally Plex was definitely easier it’s just that they have started to extract value from that which does suck.

          • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Plexamp is GREAT; I’ve not found another app like it that works with a home hosted music streaming server.

          • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Easier sure, but it comes at the expense of all traffic (even streaming to a device on your local network) going through their servers. If you have an internet outage or their servers go down, you can’t even stream media locally with Plex. No such issues with Jellyfin.

            Edit: apparently my frustrations about this were based on something I set up incorrectly, so +1 point for Plex working locally without internet, -1 point for ease of use/setup if I had this wrong for years without knowing it or finding the fix on my own.

            • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You’re not alone. The first time I lost access to my locally-stored content when my internet went out, I searched for a solution. There is, one, but it’s not obvious–or at least wasn’t back when I encountered this problem. I don’t know why it would be the default setup, I can’t think of a good reason, only nefarious ones. It’s one of the reasons I dumped Plex, in spite of having a life-time pass I paid $75 for, I stopped trusting them.

            • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              24 hours ago

              This is incorrect, bordering on outright FUD. Plex only uses their servers for the initial server discovery. When you sign into Plex, your device basically contacts the central plex discovery server and goes “hey, which servers do I have access to? And where are they located?” Plex’s server then passes that info back to the device, so the device can reach those servers directly. No actual content hits Plex’s servers by default. Hell, Plex wouldn’t want content hitting their servers by default, because it’s a truly astronomical amount of bandwidth that would be required on their end, for no real benefit.

              You can technically use their relay option to bounce the video stream off of their server, but they specifically say that it’s a last-ditch workaround for troubleshooting. Because their relay server is intentionally bandwidth-capped and will throttle your video quality. So the relay is only really meant to be used for troubleshooting and edge cases.

              “Aha! But you need to contact their server to get access even on LAN! So it will stop working when your internet goes out!” You can just configure the device to use a direct connection instead. This will allow you to connect directly to a server on your LAN. No need for their handshake server.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Jellyfin is amazing for a lot of things, but it shouldn’t be available externally. There are a few critical security concerns that devs have openly stated will never be patched. And that makes it a non-starter for sharing with people who can’t figure out how to use a personal VPN connection. It may be fine for me and my household… But there’s no way I’m going to be able to walk my tech-illiterate grandmother through it over the phone.

        In contrast, Plex makes sharing server access very easy. Since they run a centralized server to handle all of the “which servers do I have access to, and where are they located” automatic discovery traffic, sharing content is as simple as sending an invite link. That centralization flies in the face of what Jennyfin stands for, so they won’t ever implement it. I even have a burner Plex account that already has access to my server, which I can use to sign into TVs when I don’t want to bother with the whole account setup process. Handy for things like parties, because I have a few “just hit play and drunk people will enjoy it” types of playlists ready to go.

        Basically, Jellyfin for yourself and your household. Plex for everyone else. Luckily, the two will happily run side-by-side without any issues.

        • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I’m not confident enough in my knowledge to ever open up my server externally, even after reading some methods that are allegedly safe (or relatively safe). I’d just rather not take the risk of me misunderstanding something or failing to keep current with vulnerabilities.

          I suppose I see the appeal if Plex handles that without hassle, but man… not for $750. Lol

        • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This is a concern if you just port forward through a router. This isn’t a problem if you simply use a reverse proxy, which is standard and normal and expected and not difficult at all.

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 hours ago

            It’s a concern even with a reverse proxy. The reverse proxy encrypts your connection from A to B, but does nothing to stop the various security concerns that have been noted. Because those concerns don’t rely on intercepting unencrypted traffic. If you can reach Jellyfin’s main log in page, you can exploit it. Full stop.

            The only way a reverse proxy would stop someone from being able to exploit it is to include a separate login on your reverse proxy, meaning attackers wouldn’t even be able to hit Jellyfin’s landing page unless they know your proxy’s password. But notably, this breaks basically everything except for browsers. All of your smart TVs, mobile apps, etc would stop functioning, because they’d bounce off of that reverse proxy login page.

            • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              I don’t proxy the port, I proxy the routes needed for auth and interface. This isn’t that hard.

              EDIT: ah I see what you’re saying, you’re talking about the app surface rather than the raw admin API. The risk is small enough with the remaining attack surface that I’m not particularly worried, though obviously I’d like it to be better.

  • SirMaple__@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Couldn’t pay me to use that software lol

    Used Kodi and now using Jellyfin.