• SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And your employment history, financial status, known associates, voter record, you get the idea.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “You’ll eventually give in” Tells you everything you need to know about the power of large tech companies in the US .

    We have the money and the power to force this technology in to the mainstream. Tech companies know that Congress is way too old, way too corrupt, and way too slow to really do anything about regulating stuff like this in a reasonable time frame. They have no real barriers and the heads of these companies don’t give a shit about the user as long as they pay their monthly subscription.

  • redwattlebird@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So creeps like Zuck can upload their LLM conscience into my brain? No thank you.

    … Actually, that would make a great horror movie.

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Can’t wait for adverts for the ass blaster 9000® to be beamed directly into my frontal lobe without my consent.

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been evangelising for smart glasses for years. But even if they get the functionality I’ve been hoping for I’m still not going to get them, because i don’t want every woman i meet to think I’m secretly recording her tits

    There’s no way I’m letting Elon musk do brain surgery on me to harvest my thoughts

    • raldone01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      What functionality are you looking for? Most I can think of is gimmicky at best.

      Would be interested even in gimmicky use cases.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh, plenty of what i want is gimmicky. GIVE ME A HUD!

        But i can think of things like overlaying arrows on the environment when getting walking directions, setting reminders by seeing things/people, being able to fully view 3d objects when doing things like identifying something (say a flower you’ve seen) by image

        • raldone01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah this usual stuff would be nice but the trade off with privacy and surveillance is not worth the risk IMO. :(

          I want a health bar.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So many people are already functionally hooked up, even if it is happening through their eyes and not a direct wire. Prove me wrong, everybody: don’t touch any of your devices for a week. It’s nigh unthinkable now but I remember times when the internet didn’t exist, cell phones didn’t exist, I had no cable TV, no game console, and would only turn on my little black and white Mac to write a paper for school. We listened to music a lot, socialized in person, smoked a lot of… various things, had a lot of sex. It’s a rather poor trade we’ve made if you ask me.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There are people with functioning brain implants helping the blind to see, the deaf to hear, etc.

      They don’t work nearly as well as the evolutionary naturally grown versions, they have some nasty technical problems, but they do work after a fashion.

      The underlying assumption is “exponentially growing scientific knowledge and technical capability” will turn these dreams real - and it will, for some very small subset of what is being dreamed. I don’t think a practical “everybody gets one” smartphone in the brain is coming in the next 100 years, but who knows?

    • Archr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I yearn to go back to the days when a 2 minute lapse in focus/interest didn’t subconsciously send me reaching for my phone.

        • Archr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yea. I have tried a few. But they either don’t work for me. Or the come down at the end of the day leaves me unable to do anything.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I know. My weakness isn’t necessarily waiting time, but time spent on dull work like housework. My brains starts going “BOORRING!”

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Too bad I can’t trust either the competence or intent of those with resources to create brain chips. Sorry teenaged me that desperately wanted true VR, but I’ll probably decline it even if it becomes a thing.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ll note here that VR goggles were “a thing” 10+ years ago, fast forward to today and they still pretty much suck, like they did back then. Yeah, marginal specs improvements, but the core weaknesses (limited FOV, lower than quality screen resolution, heavy) still apply.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And the fundamental weaknesses, like the disconnect between the game world you’re playing in and the physical world your body needs to play from. You can still run into things in the physical world and pass through things in the virtual world. No physical touch interaction at all from the VR world back to ours, other than vibrations. Still limited by gravity as well as the input devices being used. Can’t really experience non-human shaped things. Hell, even driving around in a vehicle, something VR is relatively good at, isn’t the same because you don’t feel the acceleration and g-forces.

        Games like beat saber are the only ones it’s strong at, though I’m sure I’ve done many cuts that would have taken my arm or fatally wounded my legs.

    • Archr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t think I would even trust an open source version that I fully control. Either it would be a pain in the ass to maintain it or it would eventually have some major vuln discovered and lead to people being hacked. Too risky.

  • Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    We could be granting everyone in the world a high standard of living but instead we’re going to charge them to self-induce early onset neurodegenerative disease.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    How anyone could trust them at this point blows my mind, outside of people who need a fucking hail mary like those with neurological disorders.

    Idk. I don’t know if I’ll be able to stop from being a bigot towards people who get chips in their brain. Like I simply do not think I will be capable of holding my tongue. Again, unless the chip is literally the only reason they can live a normal life, those people shouldn’t be treated like people.