• Always one of my favorite parts of that episode.

        You can see a decent bit depending on terrain in most places, more if the terrain is higher than surrounding areas, but she pops out of a crack, looks around and sees ice for a few hundred yards, and gives up.

        In fairness, without direction, some form of marker, or obvious landmark, wandering around in a blizzard would have been death for both of them… Not that they would have been able to walk to civilization even if they DIDN’T have injuries…

        Still though, they’ve experienced varied terrain in plenty of planets, so assuming the whole planet is ice is something Sam would have corrected someone else on in a heartbeat. (and also made the argument that for all intents and purposes, for them it may as well be a whole planet)

        I wonder how much better we could have had it if the location budget were like 4x what they had. Eventually you start to recognize specific rocks in the quarry… My wife likes to call one rock Terry because it has two vaguely eye-shaped holes, and “because it’s terrible how often they use that place”

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      26 days ago

      Or a really cheap single set piece that vaguely fits the theme of an ancient earth culture that has managed to not change at all in millenia, and then there is a single high tech alien device in the middle of it.

      BTW, I say that with love. Stargate is the best.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      Even the desert is Canada. The desert scenes were filmed in Richmond, BC at a sand and gravel quarry (no longer there now).

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s probably more realistic. Most planets are just barren rocks that are too hot or too cold, aren’t they?

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        I don’t know if we have enough evidence to make such claims tbh. In our solar system, half the planets are rocks with a metal core (riffs playing in the background), the other half are gas giants. Among the gazillion moons though, there are some ice moons (like Titan and Europa), Venus only has no oceans because it is too hot, Mars has a volcanic past and may be warmer had it a thicker athmosphere and has polar ice caps, etc. There is a lot going on on these “barren rocks” and a lot of them being barren rocks could be due to them being located outside the goldilock zone.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Those planets typically don’t heave a breathable atmosphere, though. You pretty much need a large biosphere if you want to be able to walk around without a spacesuit. An iceball world or a barren rock probably won’t contain a breathable amount of oxygen in an otherwise mostly inert atmosphere. If you want to breathe pure carbon dioxide or get fried by nearly unfiltered UV radiation, though, they’d be great.

    • jaaake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Star Trek: Every planet is either a set or within driving distance of Los Angeles

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    “Wait wait, you’re from Doloron? Oh my god, I work with someone from the Swamp Planet!”

    “Why does everyone call it that. It’s a planet with one or two famous swamps.”

    “What was it like growing up in a mud hut?”

    “We have other ecosystems! You know, mountains, fields, outlet malls…”

    “How did you get to school? Bark canoes? On the back of a swamp snail?”

    “No, like everyone else… In hover cars.”

    “Is it true you all have eggs sacs? Take off your pants.”

    “No I’m not taking off my pants!”

    “Aha! We got a swamp monster here!”

    “Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! (sigh) 50 years ago, Dread Trooper scouts landed in a swamp on our planet, and for some reason didn’t bother exploring anywhere else. If they had gone one mile to the left, they would have found some beautiful beachfront condos. But they didn’t. And now… we’re the (air quotes) swamp planet. How do you think that makes me feel?”

    “I uh…”

    “Don’t say anything. Let’s just eat our lunch in silence.”

    “… Is that moss!?”

    “It’s a delicacy!”

  • skibidi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    In fairness, seasons and varied terrain aren’t guaranteed.

    Of all the bodies in the solar system, only Earth has such a wide variety of landscape. Mars is rocky desert or rocky desert with canyons. Pluto is ice ball or rocky ice ball. Etc.

    Also, if humans were colonizing earth from outside, we would probably just build cities on the river deltas and skip the less habitable spots. Stories set here would then just be cityscape or river delta, even though the ice caps/mountains/jungles/deserts still exist. Colonized worlds will have different population distribution that organically settled ones.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      Mars is rocky desert or rocky desert with canyons.

      Mars has river deltas. It has flat plains. It has shifting rolling dunes. It has mountains and valley. It has a twisting series of canyons so constricted they’re called the Labyrinth of Night. It has vast ice sheets and polar caps of frozen carbon dioxide and water. It has caves and frozen mud flats and a thousand other varied forms.

      Mars is a world. It is a place. It has biomes as varied and unique as those of Earth.

      Pluto is ice ball or rocky ice ball.

      There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Mars may have “river deltas”, but without the river.

        Mars is a world. It is a place. It has biomes as varied and unique as those of Earth.

        Suuure. A biome is a geographical region with a specific climate, flora and fauna. Mars doesn’t have much climate because it has very little atmosphere, and it has no flora or fauna. There’s no way in hell that it has biomes as varied as earth.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          26 days ago

          They are more subtle, but they are there. And it does have an atmosphere. It’s substantial enough that communication to the surface can be lost for months due to planet-spanning dust storms. Yes, it’s only 1% the pressure of Earth’s at the surface, but that’s enough, especially when you allow forces to act over geological time scales.

          And yes, they can be as varied as those on Earth. Life doesn’t actually increase the biome variety as much as you think it does. The kind of life you get in any given biome on Earth is a direct function of the geology and climate in the area. Input a given altitude, rainfall, temperature, and soil conditions, and you’ll get a similar biome anywhere on Earth. Yes, there are different individual species in the rain forests of South America vs the rain forests of Africa, but they’re both rain forests. They work as biomes in similar ways. Wherever the local climate and geology support rain forests, rain forests sprout up. The only exception is isolated islands that can’t be reached by certain species.

          This is why Mars can have the same biome diversity as Earth. The living components of Earth’s biomes are a direct mapping to the nonliving components. Earth’s living biomes are no more diverse than the underlying geology and climate.

          And this is before we even consider Martian life forms, which almost certainly exist. We know of bacteria that exist deep in the Earth’s crust that, if you transported them to deep under the Martian surface, would be able to survive and thrive just fine with zero modification. We know Mars used to have vast oceans and all the ingredients necessary to get life started. And we’ve seen numerous bits of circumstantial evidence of bacterial life present in some capacity on Mars today. While scientists are loathe to affirmatively proclaim life on Mars. The extant existence of bacterial life on Mars today really isn’t that an unusual claim. If life could get started on Earth, there’s no reason to believe it couldn’t have started on Mars. And that’s before you consider pansperia. If nothing else, we know life can comfortably exist deep in the planet’s crust. And who knows how such life might affect conditions on the surface.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            26 days ago

            Mars has no biomes because Mars has no known life. You can’t skip the “bio” part of the word.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      26 days ago

      Some Sci-Fi planet types are reasonable.

      The Kepler program found a lot of exoplanets and has categorized them generally as Hot Jupiters, Cold Gas Giants, Ocean Worlds & Ice Giants, Rocky Planets and Lava Worlds.

      Exoplanet types with major types "Hot Jupiters", "Cold Gas Giants", "Ocean Worlds & Ice Giants", "Rocky Planets" and "Lava Worlds"

      If you ignore the gas giants because there’s no surface to land on, rocky planets (and maybe desert planets) would be extremely common. Water or ice planets would also be incredibly common. And, if you’re really unlucky, you might end up on a lava planet – one that’s small and very close to its sun.

      What wouldn’t be common are things like an entire planet that’s a swamp, or an entire planet that’s a forest of Earth-style trees. I’m sure it’s entirely possible that on some planet there’s a life-form that becomes the dominant form and that looks vaguely like Earth-style trees, but not the kind you see on a typical SciFi show filmed near Vancouver.

    • Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Honestly, by the numbers, Earth is mostly an ocean/forest planet with some desert. Desert and ice planets are believable, too, given those are more temperature-based, and city planets seem like they’d be inevitable in a sci-fi setting just due to population sizes.

      • halowpeano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        By the numbers I think it’s an ocean planet with 71% coverage. Of the land, it’s actually pretty evenly split 1/3 forest, 1/3 desert, 1/3 grass or shrubland.

        Given what we know of the Earth’s own history, forest planets, ice planets, and desert planets are all possible and the Earth has been each in different geologic times. Although in every case there will be pockets of other biomes that are very large on a human scale. A single France-sized forest would be massive to a human explorer, even if the rest of the planet is ocean and ice.

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yeah, plus NMS has come a really really long way since release and they haven’t ever asked for another dime.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I imagine No Man’s Sky is doing this specifically to reference the trope as was originally commonly portrayed in e.g. Flash Gordon serials and various golden age comics. Similar to Starbound, this also has an intentional gameplay implication in that it forces you to leave the planet and find another one with the biome appropriate for whatever resource it is you need. Otherwise you could park your butt on one planet and never have any compelling reason to go anywhere else which really rather defeats the intent of the game.

    As far as other works of fiction go, though, yes. It’s just lazy.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      One way this could work is having biomes so far apart that it’s more resource efficient to hyperdrive to another planet than traveling all the way.

      Outside of that, it probably wouldn’t change No Man’s Sky much if a planet’s poles were colder and had mildly different features

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    26 days ago

    Don’t forget that if the planet is inhabited, it has only has one civilization that is mono-ethnic and mono-cultural. Star Trek is the most prominent offender example of this. Still a good series though.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      Oh man, in general, people be raving about aliens, but never give two looks to the ants in their garden. Or you know, the entirety of Australia. Or the deep sea. We have so much life that’s alien buzzing around us. Hell, we even have the Scottish – humanoids that speak an entirely cryptic language. It’s so much more compelling story-telling, too, if they don’t arrive here in a spaceship, but rather have been living among us all this time.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        Oh man, in general, people be raving about aliens, but never give two looks to the ants in their garden.

        Idk about that. “Honey, I Shrunk The Kids” did numbers.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    25 days ago

    Imagine how jank that game would have been on release if they tried varied procedurally generated biomes hahaha.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    I would love it if something like star trek would address this. Even a handwavey “this region is the only area with humanoid life” would be good enough for me

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Hey, be good if we wreck all this, which belongs to us all by birthright, so the ultra-rich could get to one of them and build a massive slave colony, with a green house exclusively for themselves to masterbate in, while we fight over oxygen, right?

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    I wonder if a single-biome planet with life would actually be more likely to produce predators that could threaten a human visitor. Like, would Wampas actually be more likely to evolve on a fully frozen planet like Hoth than a planet with some temperate climates that creep into their niche occasionally over the eons? Sci fi loves when dangerous native fauna threatens an advanced human visitor.