• Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I can understand the FTC being involved because trade. But the FCC? Maybe regulatory authority over WiFi? But this seems like massive over reach.

    Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

    • halowpeano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      I mean… “Small government” Republicans were always demonstrably lying, as far back as any of them have been alive. Every one of them just wanted to shift money from things that support people to the pockets of their donors.

  • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Build your own open WRT router or get one of theirs. It’s the best way to go and you don’t get dragged through the monthly fee wringer for stupid child security or other stuff that is not well designed.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The excuse that it’s for security reasons just immediately falls apart when you get to this part of the article:

    The notice from the FCC states that companies can apply for conditional approval for new products from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security. However, that requires the businesses to provide a plan for shifting at least some of their manufacturing to the US in order to receive that conditional approval.

    So it’s fine to supposedly threaten national security if you do some more manufacturing in the US? Uh-huh. How does that balance out exactly?

    • MortUS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In the Age of Technology and AI, it does make sense to have any manufacturing operations in house than overseas. Ofc if there were countries we could trust that would be onpar as well, but the U.S. pretty much shit the bed on alliances.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sounds like it’s just a modern version of Indulgences to me.

        You have all sinned against God America, but if you pay the donation to the church government then you will be given access to heaven America

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:

    1. get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
    2. Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
    3. Force users to use ISP provided equipment.
  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    TPLink needed to get their shit in order for years. This has been cooking since 2019. However, this administration is just turned it into a bribery scheme.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Even more isolationism. Knowing how the usa works, they discovered the equipment was set up for spying on their people and they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

      My assumption as well, after after the video release in the Guthrie case, we know objectively that every device with a microphone or camera and a wireless connection is spying on us and feeding the data to the US government without a warrant too.

  • Kelp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So this may be a good place to ask. With this news in mind does anyone have a good guide to follow to build your own router. I’ve read a little that a mini pc with more than one Ethernet port is the only requirement but I haven’t found any good guides yet, only articles on why you should.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you search for “install OPNsense” or “install PFsense” you’ll find quite a few guides. It’s not difficult to get going with these, but you should expect a bit of a learning curve if you’re coming from preconfigured home routers. It’s worth it though: these are far more powerful systems than regular home router software and give you much more control and advanced features like VLANs and intrusion detection.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Only US allowed to spy on it’s denizens!!1

    People not being sure what their router is actually doing is the issue. Instead of hoping for local manufactoring why not mandate against black box software running on the router? Mandate routers come with schematics like all electronics used to do? Promote computer literacy while you’re at it.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A nice thought. But the Great Unwashed Masses do not care. They want a Quick Start Guide that just says “Plug it in” and no other steps required. They want the black box because they don’t want to learn and understand.

      And that attitude is less about the oligarchy and a lot more about all lazy people.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Awesome. So what used to be a $50 router is about to be a $150 router. Great.