What do you think about Ecosia? I have a habit of using Ecosia as the default search engine. And I do this because a while ago I was looking for a private and ethical alternative to Google.
In my view, Ecosia is a very ethical organization committed to its mission of acquiring money to finance natural restoration projects. I admit that I haven’t looked into it in depth so far, but they have a habit of releasing transparency reports.
The problem, if you can call it that, is that Ecosia isn’t very private, since it sends data to Bing to make it work. However, I think there’s good reason to trust the Ecosia organization even with this. After all, in their marketing, they’re concerned about creating a private search engine, or at least collecting only minimal data. So maybe it’s not so private now, but and in the future?
They have already shown themselves to be committed to their mission and that is why I trust them.
I do have an opinion about Ecosia, but it’s just based on feelings, so it doesn’t even make sense to share it. Apologies for not answering your question.
Instead I would like to focus on this point:
Ecosia isn’t very private, since it sends data to Bing
Also DuckDuckGo does this, but they aggregate and anonymize that data before forwarding it to Bing. That’s probably the best they can do without building their own first-party infrastructure. I would imagine Ecosia does the same.
no, ddg uses bing’s searches plus its own little index, but you never touch bings server, ddg does it for you, data being sent to bing comes from their servers not your pc
Sure, that’s what I thought. And Ecosia doesn’t do the same?
i think ddg purportedly doesnt collect users data when they connect to ddg’s servers. im completely unaware of how ecosia handles any of this since it always felt like greenwashing to steal users data but im going by feels now i never did much investigation
Ecosia is better than using big tech directly, that’s for sure. But ofc it’s not private.
The money for the trees comes from something, but at least it’s used for something nice.
To care more about the environment than privacy is a fair choice.
I like trees so I use it.
me gusta https://github.com/searxng/searxng
implementations of these seem to have shorter lifespans than the collective american attention span; my firefox bookmarks library has become a graveyard of the ones i used for a couple of weeks/months before they inevitably go offline.
Make your own instance.
I did and deepseek outlasted it. Lol
I use Ecosia daily. Obviously, it isn’t private but I believe that is worth the sacrifice especially since they’re legitimately planting trees.
I use Ecosia nearly exclusively.
I don’t like it as much as DDG; which has a somewhat better privacy focus, more widgets, and better support for “bangs”.
But the bangs I really care about are still there, it’s European and working on a European search index along with Quant, and the trees are pretty cool too.As is it still relies on either Bing or Google for the results, but oh well. So does basically every alternative search engine, and I’d rather go through Ecosia than directly through those two.
It works for me.
It’s there since long enough to know that, if privacy was on their roadmap, it would already be there. That’s my point of view, but I haven’t take a look at their stance about it, it might be in the works, I just don’t know.
There is also an Metasearch engine which, like Ecosia, create search revenues to support several charity projects (Environment, Education, Medical Support), Max-Impact (FOSS)
interesting, i didn’t knew about Max-impact
