description

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. I looked up algorithms for the last layer. After a few solves it stuck in muscle memory.

    The first solves took a good while, but I was getting consistently under a minute after a week.

    I haven’t speedcubed in quite a few years, but I spin the 4x4x4 a few times a week to keep those parity problems in muscle memory.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. It took me a little longer but it makes such a nice fidget for lectures / meetings. The procedurality of it is almost soothing.

  • Deadful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. I got two for my oldest children as Easter gifts. They scrambled them and after a few minutes of frustration, left them lying on the floor.

    I encourage them to keep trying to solve them but they told me " what chance do I have if you can’t even do it?" I thought about it and realized that they were right.

    I downloaded a PDF of a Rubik’s beginner guide I found online and solved it in about an hour. I felt like I had conquered the world!

    While bragging to my wife I saw my youngest scrambling it again and my heart sank. My wife saw my reaction and said “what’s the big deal? Don’t you know how to do it now?”

    I explained that I had essentially cheated, but had to admit that the steps weren’t as hard as I had imagined. I decided then and there that I was going to learn and eventually memorized the beginner method!

    After getting a speed cube and lots of practice, I started averaging about 2 mins. After watching some videos online I decided to give the CFOP method a try. It felt like starting over but I was patient and now I can do it in close to 30sec.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, the Petrus method is my preferred. It is of course suboptimal these days at the highest level but still, I believe, the most logical to reason about.

  • ObM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mathologer (YouTube did a good explanation of creating cube algorithms). Search something like: mathologer design rubiks algorithm

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    In true billionaire style, I paid someone else to do it and then took credit since it was my money that made it possible.

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are many good methods. They aren’t hard to learn as long as you can memorize a few 7-10 move algorithms.

    For people recommending using screwdrivers and sticker peeling, they’re actually much easier than that to disassemble and reassemble. Turn one face 45 deg. Pop an edge up. The whole thing will fall apart. Tougher to assemble but not too bad. Only problem is you have a 2/3 change to accidentally assemble an unsolvable corner rotation and a 50% chance to assemble an unsolvable edge flip. Both are easily fixed if you can spot it by flipping any edge and rotating any corners once or twice as needed, but then if you’re able to spot it, you already know that.