• Stormcrow@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Simple regedit used to fix this, but then stuff started to not work quite right as it got updated, and now I don’t think that regedit works anymore.

    • Dymonika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Anyone who wants to try Linux but is scared of or reluctant about anything about the process at all: talk to me! There are multiple ways to try it with zero change to your system, like Oracle VirtualBox or a USB flash drive.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    10 days ago

    In Windows 10, you could move it to the top, left, or right of the screen.

    In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10. Let’s not sell short the full extent idiocy on display, here.

    “Pouring its engineering resources,” my ass.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      In the launch version of windows 11 and for over TWO YEARS it didn’t even support drag&drop. It was working fine even on windows me

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        10 days ago

        Drag and drop worked on windows 3.1. That was like the whole thing. “LOOK WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW!”

        At this point, I’m fairly sure pissing people off is the point with Windows 11. It’s full of AI no one wants, refuses to officially run on most hardware that people already have, despite running just fine on that same hardware UNofficially, dropped support for drag and drop, doesn’t let you move the taskbar.

        And thats not even to mention the fact that it monitors you, and reports back to HQ with screen grabs and usage activity.

        Oh look, ZorinOS, just one singular distro, had 1.6 million downloads in the past 2 months.

        Wait, is there any special thing that happened 2 months ago? Oh right. Windows 10 support ended, and microsoft told its userbase “fuck you, you can’t get support for windows 10, and this computer can’t update to windows 11. This computer is now trash!”

        Suddenly all these youtube videos pop up “Is your PC unable to install windows 11? Try linux!”

        And these videos don’t try to sway you to one distro or another. They point out a few big hitters like mint or ubuntu. I can’t imagine them specifically naming zorin, unless it’s a zorin centric video. But I’m talking about the flood of “try linux” videos that popped up in October.

        And that 1.6 million is JUST zorin. That’s the runoff. I don’t have numbers, or sources, but gut instinct tells me that if Zorin had 1.6 million downloads, Mint must have had like 5 million minimum. Every video always reccomends Mint. It’s probably overtaken Ubuntu at some point as most used distro.

        And all of this, every single bit of user loss has NOTHING to do with linux. Users are angrily switching. Not happily. They feel abandoned, and forced to switch.

        If Microsoft either extended Windows 10 support, or allowed Windows 11 to be installed on reasonable hardware, this linux boom DOES NOT HAPPEN. This is Microsoft saying “Yeah bitch, money is tight! Go buy another computer, loser! You’ll do what we say, and there’s nothing you can do to stop us!”

        That’s when users switched to linux. This is pure hubris from Microsoft. It would be interesting if somehow we could get a combined number of EVERY distros doenload numbers.

        • anon5621@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          It also has a very poorly written UI interface that’s fucking infuriating. I was reverse engineering it to figure out why it’s so damn slow on HDDs, with explorer.exe rendering like shit, the Start menu crawling, and taskbar popups that make you want to smash your screen. They wrote really really fucking bad code compared to the Win7 days—basically just took the old MFC crap and slapped a XAML wrapper on it to make it look “nice.” What a fucking disaster.

          • felbane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I read some article or saw some video claiming that explorer was basically a react app now, which is why unlocking the screen takes 3.5 business days when you enter the correct password.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Uh, what? Can you clarify what you mean by “drag&drop”? Because dragging and dropping files or text around within or between application windows definitely worked even when Win 11 was new, so you’re probably talking about some specific instance, I assume?

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          The taskbar on windows 11 for the first two years didn’t support dragging and dropping on icons or opened applications. It was completely unusable

          • hikaru755@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Ah, okay, gotcha. Yeah that’s fair. Not something I’ve ever really used, so wasn’t aware of that. Your comment read to me as if Windows as a whole just didn’t support drag&drop.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Look at this video from 4 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGHokrbjlz8

          I updated even on the beta version and at the beginning I was like “well it’s a beta, surely they will fix it”… Then it launched with the broken taskbar and I thought “surely this will be patched in a week” - it took TWO YEARS

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10.

      Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before. It was in Windows 8 (and Windows Server 2012 for some godforsaken reason) with the cursed “metro” interface. MS did it for the same stupid reason they’re citing here “tablet and touchscreen users”. The uproar caused MS to release Windows 8.1 a year later where they returned the Start button.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before

        They didn’t say that every version of windows since then had a start button

        First of all they only talked about the start menu, which was still part of 8, even if it was annoying and full-screen. And second they only said that every Windows version that had that allowed you to move the taskbar around. Not that every Windows version so far had it.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    10 days ago

    Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    WHAT DATA?!

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        If they were using that data, then they would have included features people actually use in 10. Or maybe they’re just doing the inverse of whatever the data suggests.

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Or maybe you’re overestimating the amount of people who actually used that. Spending effort on something that less than maybe 1% of users actually use and that is not load bearing to any important workflows is hard to argue for when you’re a corp that is only concerned about its own bottom line. It’s a pretty rational business decision, even if you (and I) disagree with it.

        • pemptago@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s the data of what corners MS can cut to save more money than they lose when x number of users decide enough is enough.

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

      Which is why if you dig deep enough into Settings you’ll see WinXP Control Panel UI elements. You know, the elements that are actually useful for power users.

        • Dave.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          The main one I use is the network adaptor settings, where you can enable/disable protocols and most importantly for me, where you can easily add multiple IP addresses on a network adaptor.

          The Win 8+ network settings page is an absolute trainwreck. I particularly like how it doesn’t warn about conflicting IP addresses now and just silently accepts your given address and provides an auto-assigned 169.254 address instead if it sees even the smallest hint of another computer out there using the address you want to use.

          Guaranteed fun and confusion trying to access/ping things until you finally check the status of the network adaptor and discover the auto assigned address, thanks Microsoft.

          Not everyone wants to use dhcp, which is clearly their preferred direction, and there have been bugs where Cisco devices trigger that flip to auto assigned addresses even if things are fine.

          • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 days ago

            Most of the old settings are at least easily reached if you can remember their names such as ncpa.cpl for the settings you mention but when you write “control printers” you get sent into the new Settings view now. Instead you gotta go to the control panel and change view from category to small or large icons to finally right click Devices and Printers and choose “open in a new window” to get there. If you left click it you get sent to the new Settings view.

            • Dave.@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 days ago

              It seems that every new release adds another layer of indirection (misdirection?) between you and the useful stuff you need to access. I use a third party utility to manage IP settings, and it’s one click from its menu to get to the network adapter page. It takes me about 5 minutes of angry clicking around in stock standard win11 before I get to the same place.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Two data points: What their intern could do with React; what their intern couldn’t do with React.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 days ago

    Microsoft’s data shows such users are really small when compared to the number of users who are asking for other newer features in the taskbar.

    Asking for things like AI integration everywhere?

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      Wouldn’t it be cool if you could have AI on the desktop clock so you could ask it what time it was in different places in the world?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 days ago

        I was going to make a joke that they could also replace the taskbar search bar with an AI chat bar, but after reading the article, it turns out that they’re planning on doing that for real:

        Windows 11 taskbar is now being “upgraded” with AI-first features. Microsoft is working on the Ask Copilot bar, which may replace Windows Search in the taskbar.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 days ago

    “When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge.”

    This is such utter fucking nonsense. They already have to deal with the concept of a “client area” that encompasses variable-sized screens and (worse) the multiple-monitor situation. Movable task bar is trivial.

    • kalpol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Linux is missing enterprise management tools. For all its horrible flaws, nothing like SCCM, In tune, group policy, and Active Directory (in the sense of managing group policy, not so much identity) exist for Linux. Fix that, even commercially, and you might see a real change.

      • oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        No thanks! I’m more into abolishing capitalism than facitating it further. I’m looking forward to the end of all commercial enterprises and especially management! It should be as difficult and expensive as possible to establish hierarchical systems of digitally managing large corporations.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 days ago

    The bit about apps having to reflow seems nonsensical. They have to reflow any time the user resizes their windows.

    I’m not accepting any excuses from MS about limited resources when Linux desktop environments built by hobbyists have the feature in question.

    • Undearius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      They have to reflow any time the user resizes their windows.

      The whole operating system is even named after that concept.

    • THB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah especially considering you can install 3rd party solutions to dock the taskbar to the left which work perfectly fine

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 days ago

    When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge

    It was working fine in windows 95. Suddenly all programmers became incompetent and can’t handle something like that?

    • BigMilk13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Plasma is everything I used to wish Windows’ desktop could be, but isn’t because of… honestly I have no idea what they’re thinking over there. I am so glad I dumped that trainwreck. Love everything KDE <3

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s quite an article to say they forgot about it after re-writing the task bar for no reason. It’s such a basic expected feature.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Tali Roth, the then product manager working on the core Windows user experience, including the Start menu, taskbar, and notifications, took up the question and talked about how building the taskbar from scratch meant that they had to cherry-pick things to put into the feature list first, and the ability to move the taskbar didn’t make the cut, for several reasons that Microsoft values.

    WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?!

    If you have working code, why would you rewrite it from scratch? Refactor, sure. Overhaul, maybe. But why rewrite the whole thing?! You’re gaining nothing but unnecessary bugs.

    I know all the joke answers. To justify a product manager’s salary, because Microsoft gonna Microsoft, whatever. I want to know the real reason. Why would you ever rewrite working code from scratch if you don’t have to?

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      Probably to add something terrible for the user but good for MS. Ad integration? Easier to spy?

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        That’s fair, but even with that, it’s got to be easier to shove it into existing code. Especially if you’re trying to do it in a way that people don’t notice!

        And actually, the Windows 10 start menu infamously had ads, too. So it can’t be that.

    • BuckenBerry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      I assume the code was just too old and convoluted to maintain properly. I’m a bad coder so I’ve definitely redone parts of my scripts from scratch rather than trying to refactor them.

      Then again I’m not a small billion dollar indie company who’s main focuses are spying on users and helping to commit genocide.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Someone on Microsoft probably needed an excuse for their pay increase.

      “I rebuilt/had the idea to rebuilt the taskbar” sounds a lot better to managers than “I maintained the taskbar”.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 days ago

    The amount of bullshit is incredible. The DE sets the windows position. The DE tells the apps what’s the “usable” desktop area. It worked for decades. And now “you can’t imagine the amount of work”

    Fuck you microsoft. Not that I care anymore. Even your excuses are pathetic.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      There was a while back some Windows developer externally lamenting how ass-backwards they were and as a result their NT kernel was woefully under-featured compared to other contemporary OSes…

      Then I think they forced him to take it back and say ‘um actually our kernel is actually super awesome, my mistake’.