• TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      I met her once. I didn’t even recognise her until I had to ask for ID (American tourists never sign their credit cards). And then I was like, oh. It’s Monica Lewinsky.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            kind of missing the point by not explaining how it prevents fraud

            I’ve never needed to show my card signature for anything. ever. I’m not even sure when that would be helpful

            my cc has a code to use it via chip. online usage doesn’t require the signature. giving cc details via phone obviously doesn’t involve a visible signature. when would it ever be relevant?

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If that was actually the case it would help prevent fraud to leave it unsigned because it would be two-factor auth.

            But in reality ive never been IDd for not having it signed.

                • toynbee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I’ve seen a few people write “please see ID” or similar in the signature field. I’ve also seen many cashiers either not check the signature at all, or do so entirely performatively (IE, not trying to match the signatures or, in the case I described above, not looking closely enough to see that the payer has requested extra diligence).

                  Also, a lot of places I’ve been no longer ask for a signature under a certain cost. At one store around here, the machine prompts for a signature, but unless I proactively start it, the merchant just swipes a line across the screen with their finger.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            My photo ID is harder to fake than my signature, and I signed my ID, so if someone really needs to confirm my signature specifically, that’s already covered.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve had to fill out a few forms requiring signatures at work and am rarely asked to provide a physical copy. I don’t always have the means to use the “something I have and something I know” method and printing something, signing it and rescanning it back is just tedious.

              Instead, either Adobe or OSX - I’m not sure which - offers to generate a signature for you. Signatures don’t really have inherent value anyway, but I think it’s funny that this is even more meaningless since the system is just generating what it thinks yours should be. Also, I haven’t really experimented but I would be surprised if the signature is unique.

              You can sign with a mouse or touchpad but those results always look less like my actual signature than the generated one does.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                My first day at a job where I had to send a lot of legal letters, they showed us how to scan a signature in and make a transparent template of it to use on the computer. The attorneys I worked with all acknowledged that while it wouldn’t be a good idea to attach it to any threats or anything, the e-signature probably wouldn’t actually stand up in court as a real signature. And yet, we all still learned and used those signatures on all of our letters.

              • Mac@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, signature-based security is good in theory but is obviously heavily flawed.

                When i have to “sign” online documents all I’m required to do is click a checkbox. lol

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I have never in my life needed to use a credit card signature as verification

            • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              There are places that ask for it, and it was common before also, at least in the US. Are you perhaps on the younger side, or haven’t been much in the US about…m 10 to 15 years ago? That’s when I had the most signature confirming type stuff, with some places not accepting a card that wasn’t signed (usually smaller shops that didn’t have a customer facing POS device, or offline CC stuff, which occasionally happened at places like Cons).

        • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          In the UK it’s a thing. Especially if you don’t have chip and pin. If you don’t have a signature, we don’t take payment unless you have photo ID with the same name. We’re not paid enough to risk a jail sentence for putting through a stolen card.

  • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Plot twist: They were both single, consenting adults at the time.

    (I’m on about OP’s mam and the boss for those that need literally everything explained to them.)