Pedofile pseudo science
Yeah, I’m not taking ANY advice from this dumbass. What does he even do for a living anyways???
checks job title
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES??? HOW THE FUCK DID THAT HAPPEN???
looks at world
Oh. Right.
He’s a sperm counter.
It’s honest work counting those little wigglers.
I swear to god we have a used car salesman for a president and a snake oil huckster for secretary of health. It goes downhill from there. Everyone talks about fascism but the kakistocracy is fucking real.
It’s not the world thankfully, just their corner of it.
Imagine if we were all run by people like that, I think WWIII would happen randomly on a weekly basis haha :-(
Their solution? Pair up teenage girls with 65 year old men.
deleted by creator
Your comment history is pretty positive so giving you the benefit of the doubt here. What you said in this comment was really creepy.
I’m positive he just missed the /s tag.
Oh, oops, sorry! I definitely didn’t mean it that way at all.
Yeah no worries at all, thanks for clearing it up
deleted by creator
It’s hard to tell the difference between someone making an outrageous joke or being dead serious these days.
I for one got the sarcasm, I just though it was a pretty shit joke
Today, the average teenager in this country has 50% of the sperm count, 50% of the testosterone as a 65-year-old man. Our girls are hitting puberty six years early, and that’s bad, but also our parents aren’t having children.
Let’s practice some critical thinking. Join me!
Teens have half the sperm count of a senior citizen? I’d maybe believe they’re equivalent? Maybe? He’s getting this from dropping teen pregnancy rates.
Teens have half the testosterone of a senior citizen? Boolshit on it’s face. So senior men are more aggressive, more horny, stronger and hairier than teens? Stronger bones too! Also, seniors have more zits. Are you teen boys even trying any more?!
Parents aren’t having children. OK. I’ll let the audience stew on that one a minute.
We are below replacement right now. That is a national security threat to our country…
True! Not so much a security threat as an economic threat, maybe the same difference? So what’s the solution? Kick out the foreigners? Hey yo, Japan! How that working out?
Money says these idiots do what Russia did about their shrinking birth rates. National holiday to stay home and fuck for the Motherland! (Not even joking here.)
Our replacement rate has been low for a long time, but our population has stayed relatively steady… because of immigration.
Low replacement rate is only bad if you’re racist/xenophobic. Otherwise there’s usually (in a supposedly first-world country) an easy solution.
And if you think this is a dig on specifically the US, it isn’t. Japan and South Korea are about to have insane difficulties with a very obvious and simple solution, and the US had that solution and are destroying it in favor of racism and xenophobia.
I don’t think immigration is bad, but if the “problem” of fertility below replacement is caused by the other problem of people who might otherwise want kids not being able to have them because of economic constraints, focusing on solving the first problem by importing competitive and ambitious skilled professionals seems at least kind of questionable.
That is not the problem. Population declines as countries move to first world status, and I think the people not having kids due to financial constraints are few and far between. Otherwise population would not start and continue diminishing as an area becomes more affluent. People have less (or no) kids because they don’t want kids, don’t want a bunch of kids, and can reasonably expect the kids they have to survive to adulthood. And access to birth control, education, and other opportunities (mostly for women) makes having less kids (by their own desire) possible.
So bringing capable workers in means they pay into taxes that support the aging and school-age population, and never had to have their school-age years paid for. They’re a productive member with half the cost over their lifetime.
It’s a no-brainer… as long as you’re not worried about changing the… shade or hue… of your population over time.
The reason I’m thinking of it is I recently read this lemmy thread. The article itself is probably AI and not that convincing but I think people are making some good points about the pressures imposed by expense of housing and how those affect the desirability and difficulty of having children.
Of course a prerequisite for that to matter is that not having children is more of a real choice than it is for people with no resources in a state of poverty. But it isn’t necessarily the case that the difficulty of raising children decreases with country-wide affluence, because wealth inequality is a thing, required resources (like housing space) might become more expensive relative to income despite overall increase in income, and other factors like an increasingly atomized career focused society where community can’t be relied on as much to help raise children and the expectations placed on parents are higher, maybe requiring high daycare expenses.
So bringing capable workers in means they pay into taxes that support the aging and school-age population, and never had to have their school-age years paid for. They’re a productive member with half the cost over their lifetime.
I agree in principle with the logic here, but if those capable workers are being placed in competition with a population that is financially struggling, and those taxes are not being used to give those people more breathing room, that productivity isn’t helping and is being employed on the wrong side of a class struggle.
I think your assertion is unfounded and based on your own unreliable assessment.
There is no mystery to the fact the all the wealth is silo’d to a small class of people. Your big assumption is that developed country’s are substantially more hospitable to a majority of the population.
When kindness is considered hostility amongst the general population its no wonder why people wont have kids.
Since we know he doesn’t mess with science/empirical data…how did he get that information?
Hmmm, even if we allow for empirical scientific evidence, is there a non weird way he knows about the sperm count in the semen of adolescents? I hope he’s making shit up because the alternative is a lot grosser
It was on his Facebook group. Same way he gets all his information.
I swear he’s just such a no-good dirty lying bastard. Like I don’t even have any words for him anymore. Whole world would be better off if that worm had finished the job.
The fact that the Kennedys lobotomized a young woman for no good reason and yet allowed this putrid pestilence to permeate our world. Shit.
“I don’t know the science behind it.” Applies to his every claim.
I don’t know the science behind it… But Tylenol causes Autism in pregnancy. (RFK jr 2025)
and circumsicion! Wonder what happens for the circumsised boys that had tylenol in the womb…
Double autism.
He’s the way he is because of how they treated Rose. He’s almost guaranteed to be ADHD, maybe ASD too. The psychologists at the time didn’t really recognize it until the 1960s, and that wouldn’t mean widespread acceptance of the idea. Before that they called it something else entirely, and the common use of drugs like Ritalin and Adderall for ADHD didn’t happen until the ‘80s even though they existed far earlier.
So this dude was shipped off to boarding schools because he’s a “problem child” and a Kennedy. He was uncontrollable in schools, couldn’t stick to anything, got kicked out of boarding schools, and the only reason any of the schools put up with his shit at all was because he was a Kennedy. Got into drugs because that can happen to untreated ADHD people and people who have f’d up home lives. All this was swept under the rug by the Kennedys because they didn’t want the press to get wind of another Kennedy with “mental problems” and a drug problem. So he went untreated and unhelped. The worst thing that could happen to him was that he was born a Kennedy.
This week he’s all about sperm.
Last week he was all about circumcisions. https://lemmy.world/post/37218464
And before that, he was diagnosing kids by looking at them naked. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/rfk-jr-slammed-for-claiming-he-can-diagnose-kids-by-just-looking-at-them/ar-AA1Lrvlt
This guy sure thinks a lot about other people’s cocks.
The entire conservative movement is about children’s genitals and tax breaks for the rich
It’s his ASD hyperfixation
The worm in his brain seeking other worm-like things.
I’m pretty sure the worm in his brain is just driving his apple-shaped car in little circles around the empty cavern going weeeee!
This is not a Fry situation
He has proof, he and Trump and the rest have been able to get a lot of teenage girls pregnant. Release the Epstein files.
sighs I want off of Mr. Bones’ wild ride.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: we live in the dumbest timeline.
Dumbest timeline so far.
Oh no, so what do you propose we do about it?
He knows for a fact, since he checked it himself.
I had to scroll too far down to see this 😂
“Senile government official spews nonsense in press conference”
… and the saddest part is that sentence is not specific enough, there are multiple options to choose from
Removed by mod
sperm, not testosterone
Removed by mod
look if you want to sane wash all the stupidity, be my guess
whenever these lunatics provide credible evidence, we can talk about that
Removed by mod
Yeah, because it’s just that simple 🙄 /s
Not like other things are important.
I’m sure you also think you get better bread by adding extra extra yeast.
When an old man challenges you by saying “I have more sperm than you do” you should leave the room as quickly as possible.
Why is he so concerned with young boy dick…sounds a little epsteinish.
He was checking them out at the airport last time, for signs of “mitochrondrial challenge”.
You’re partially misguided, he’s saying girls are ready to have babies younger than before but young boys aren’t up to the task so we need old men to do it.
Also Trump started dancing when he said that girls are hitting puberty 6 years earlier than they used to which is an odd response.
Still Epsteinish but not gay.
