• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So, I looked at age verification - it was made clear photos were on device only and never transmitted.

    If this turns out to be false, then the legal fallout would be apocalyptic.

    (Edit: or not, see the comment by ambitiousprocess below)

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fact that these photos and PII (personally identifiable information) were not destroyed after the verification process was certified is absolutely atrocious OpSec. I don’t even care which of the two companies is ultimately responsible, because they are both responsible.

    1. Zendesk for their bad OpSec
    2. Discord for both outsourcing this AND not having contractual requirements to properly secure and destroy PII when it was no longer required.

    I work in IT, and treat PII like it’s dangerously radioactive, because in the digital world, it really is.

    • Tom Arrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Apparently” only those who were challenging the verification results and uploaded awaiting reverification are affected.

      Not that that isn’t bad enough

    • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Right. It blows me away the required training we have to do for physical files more secured than Fort Knox! Tech world? Eh just throw it in the recycle bin

  • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Proofs the UK is a shithole as well funnily enough.

    Nothing against the Brits but their government oh damn that’s bad.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The Labour under Starmer is closet Tory. I wish that the popular Manchester Labour mayor (whose name I forgot) takes his place as PM, which actual leftist politicians try to make him to be. Although this will be a Sysiphean task under the ruthless politicking in British politics and Labour Party’s own strict rule on who could become PM.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    And this is why this provide xyz private information for verification bs should be illegal

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      And why any service asking it should be moved on from.

      Pretty sure these people could have found a teamspeak, matrix, or mumble server without the requirement.

  • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hmm, I don’t recall ever doing age verification for Discord. Were older accounts grandfather’d in, or is it currently limited by region or something?

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think it’s a UK thing

      They have been passing legislation to basically dox their citizens for them to gain access to the internet

      • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was obvious things like this will happen, unlike banks and government sites social media sites don’t have strict cyber security requirements and they want these sites to have a government ID. It was a bad idea from the start.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Any time your account gets locked for age reason it requires it. So if you have never had an age lock it’s unlikely you had to do it.

      It’s as easy as someone reporting you for being underage with no proof or even just saying “I’m 14 and what is this” as a meme to get locked tho.

      Hell the auto flag system can hit you if you just talk like a kid sometimes.

    • newcool1230@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I believe people from EU UK and people who say they were under 13 and got reported. They needed to send in a pic of them holding their ID to get unbanned.

      edit: UK people not EU

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    Politicians: That’s the point.

    Joking aside, now that I think about it, what difference does does it make if companies are stealing infos and spying on you with government mandated age verification checks, and hackers stealing your government mandated age verification info? This just reinforces my view that governments (and companies) are nothing but glorified gangsters.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      A hacker stealing your id can do way more malicious stuff like more expertly crafted phishing and identity fraud just to name two.

      No one involved in this from the government to the companies is innocent in this chain though in my opinion. A breach is always bound to happen.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        To me giving a company or government permission to create the databases allowed for mass facial recognition is the same thing as giving the facial recognition data to criminals. It will be leaked/hacked/sold, etc. It is only a matter of time.

        How many Social security numbers in the U.S. have been leaked/hacked/sold/illegally transferred? ~340 million.

        Facial recognition will be a near useless tool for security in 10 years, and 100% for population monitoring at the rate we are going.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Option 3: companies that you pay to provide authentication service. Regulated so that they clearly tell you if they are subsidizing service outside of your payments.

      We nearly already do this with certificate services and they would probably be in a good position to offer an id service.

  • aliser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    so instead of creating some kind of authorization system that would not require sending your private information to everyone the govt did nothing and instead put that responsibility on EVERY company. begs the question why rushing so much?

  • Mwa@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    this is why i dont give my ID to any service(obv including Discord) anymore.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    the only person who’s allowed to verify my age is my cat because he won’t stop being a dick about it