• ClickToDisplay
    link
    fedilink
    1152 years ago

    Slight inaccuracy, the data only goes back to 1979 and has not yet been verified by NOAA which has data going back to 1880.

    It’s also worth noting that this is based on the Climate Reanalyzer which is intended for forecasting temperatures, not record keeping.

    It would be more accurate to say it was the hottest day ever recorded by the Climate Reanalyzer.

    Source: https://time.com/6292103/worlds-hottest-day-preliminary-record/

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      the data only goes back to 1979 and has not yet been verified by NOAA which has data going back to 1880.

      There’s a whole hot world outside of America who don’t need to wait for its underfunded organizations to get around to validating the data.

      But I get it. The news is dire. It’s neat to cling to uncertainty in times like this unless you lived in Lytton

    • @bric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      This. It’s also not accurate to say it’s the warmest we’ve been in the past 10,000 years, it was likely warmer during the roman warm period, and potentially a couple of other points. So we can only really say it’s the warmest we’ve seen in the last couple hundred years.

      That’s not to say this isn’t concerning, we’re on track to smash the roman warm periods average temperatures within our lifetimes and make the earth the hottest it’s been since the paleoscene, which would have massive ramifications. But we’re not there yet, the problem is that we will likely get there in the next few decades.

  • Juan
    link
    fedilink
    522 years ago

    And just a week ago I was talking to these boomers that were explaining me how “we should all stop being so attached to climate fear” and that “everything will just sort itself out and we’ll live just fine”.

    Yea, no shit boomer

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    412 years ago

    Vermont just had flooding that was on par with Hurricane Irene.

    They’re calling it a 1000 year rarity. It happened 12 years ago. Only this time there was no hurricane.

    There are ocean temperatures in the fucking 90s.

    This hurricane season is gonna be batshit crazy, y’all.

    • @R4iNO@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      The concept of seasons will also get super fucked. Already feeling it in North-East India - weather trends are not very predictable any more.

  • @ThoranTW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think, as individuals; we all need to pick up our game and do our part in polluting and destroying the planet more. We can’t let the corporations do all the heavy lifting after all.

    Edit: I don’t think I came across properly here, given the replies. This was sarcasm saying we need to fuck up the planet more to keep pace with the rate the corporations do.

    • @darkseer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      But we are. According to the USDA, food waste makes up 22% of the food industries 26% CO2 emissions. And don’t forget the diseases food waste produces.

      • UhBellOP
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        That food waste is largely due to arbitrary date labels and grocery stores throwing out literal tons of perfectly good food instead of donating it.

        • @Tonloc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          How can we sell more without an expiration date?!!! We need to please the profits and shorten expiration dates!

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yes. Our 12% will really make a difference vs corporations’ 80%. And we can get to that 12% if so 8 billion of us work together. I’m doing my 0.0000001% part!

      • @exi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You know corporations build shit people buy, right? It’s not like they pollute for the fun of it. They pollute because we give them money to do it…

    • @Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -82 years ago

      Honestly corporations are only producing what consume. We are using corporations as scapegoats. If we don’t realize this soon and don’t change it ways…

      • @toxic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        There are more efficient, greener ways to go about producing pretty much everything we use that doesn’t destroy the earth. Problem is is that it’s not as profitable for share holders.

        • @usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          For most categories, yes, but when it comes to something like meat production mentioned in the title here, that’s not really the case. Meat production is massively inefficient in its best case. We are going to have to reduce production which means having changes in consumption in one way or another

          If I source my beef or lamb from low-impact producers, could they have a lower footprint than plant-based alternatives? The evidence suggests, no: plant-based foods emit fewer greenhouse gases than meat and dairy, regardless of how they are produced.

          […]

          Plant-based protein sources – tofu, beans, peas and nuts – have the lowest carbon footprint. This is certainly true when you compare average emissions. But it’s still true when you compare the extremes: there’s not much overlap in emissions between the worst producers of plant proteins, and the best producers of meat and dairy.

          https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat

          Plant-based foods have a significantly smaller footprint on the environment than animal-based foods. Even the least sustainable vegetables and cereals cause less environmental harm than the lowest impact meat and dairy products [9].

          https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/8/1614/htm

        • @Zippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -42 years ago

          If it was so efficient, why are not everyone doing it and building it? If it was so efficient, why are energy prices increasing? If it is more efficient, then it would be also more profitable but you say the opposite.

          • @toxic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            It requires a front-loaded investment in infrastructure, which means lower returns for a few quarters.

            Most companies wanted people to use horses for as long as possible because that meant they had to adapt, change, and invest. Why do something that’s difficult when you can just do the same thing? This works out when you don’t really have competition because the cost to enter the market is so high due to decades of mergers and acquisitions, consolidating all means of production and materials to a select-few companies.

  • @ComradeR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I’m waiting for the hot part of the year to start where I live, and I live in a tropical country! It will be so funny! 🫠

  • Anna
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Don’t worry all of this will soon be over.

    • @bad_alloc@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I guess this is supposed to be taken as a bleak joke but it won’t be over soon. We all will likely experience a direct hit to our quality of life. If you’re poor, your survival will get harder. If you have or want children they will have fundamentally worse lives, compared to what we experienced so far. This can go on for decades or centuries, depending on how much we can stsill fix and what tipping points occur.

      So yeah, hope that is some motivation to change something. Or at least shout at some people. :)