CRISPR and other tools aren’t science fiction anymore. If the wealthy get there first, what happens to everyone else?

  • normalspark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    2 months ago

    The plot of the film Gattaca explores this, the idea of what society looks like when there’s a class of genetically engineered, “superior” people, vs. the naturally born, “inferior” class.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Is that the movie where (sorry for the bad synopsis) the guy vacuums his work desk because he wants to go to space?

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tbh, I think GATTACA barely touched the topic. It focussed so much on the brothers’ rivalry that you could strip out the genetic engineering part and it’d barely change the movie

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s a cool movie but the message of systemic disadvantages don’t matter if you try hard enough is a little questionable at best.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          The issue wasn’t “try hard enough”. It was how systematic disenfranchisement hobbles people far more than their genetics.

          Once you brand someone as “lesser”, their actual capacity is irrelevant. They won’t be given the opportunity to succeed (much less to fail and try again) while the presumed-superior cohort is offered advantage after advantage in order to prove they are better.

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          At the end it came down to him going for the launch despite knowing he’d likely get caught and the doctor letting him through despite knowing who he is, because his son was also not engineered, I think the message was people of the under class coming together to fight the system rather than just working hard

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think that was the message at all.

          The end message is that the doctor knew all along, and was helping him from the beginning. It didn’t matter how much work he put in, how hard he tried. How much he lied or cheated or “overcame his limitation”, at the end of the day he would have never succeeded without help from a fellow human.

          Doing it all himself had started to make him prideful to some degree. And realizing that, in the background, he didn’t do it all himself was a last kick of humility to (ironically) ground the character before he leaves the ground forever.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            He knew all along? I guess I didn’t pick up on that. I thought it was just at the very end.

            I can see how that might change the message of the film somewhat.

            • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not expressly said. But that’s my take on it from a few different clues. For starters, he wasnt’ surprised by the invalid reading. Also the story that he tells about his son not being “all that was promised” came early in the film, with the doctor saying “who knows what he can achieve” like a wink or a nudge almost.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, but the moral of the story was that “superior” people weren’t actually superior. They were just racist.

      The protagonist outwits and outperforms them all.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In some cases there were absolute superior though. Like the pianist with 12 fingers.

        The actual moral of the story was that it’s not worth it. Being a bit better at some random shit like swimming, playing piano or piloting a rocket is not good enough to sacrifice the rest.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Like the pianist with 12 fingers.

          Having twelve fingers isn’t what makes you good at playing the piano.

          Being a bit better at some random shit like swimming, playing piano or piloting a rocket is not good enough to sacrifice the rest.

          There’s an underlying question in the story that amounts to “if you’ve made Earth such a great place, why is everyone trying to leave?”

          The plan to colonize Titan is, at its root, a eugenics fantasy.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Having twelve fingers isn’t what makes you good at playing the piano.

            The movie literally says that the piece cannot be played without 12 fingers.

            The plan to colonize Titan is, at its root, a eugenics fantasy.

            the movie doesn’t say anything about “colonizing titan”, in fact the mission doesn’t even state what’s the purpose other than to get to titan which has never been done before - it symbolizes ultimate frontier that in the eyes of eugenicists would require a perfect human to be achieved and yet the guy that ends up outcompeting everyone is a not genetically modified and achieves this through sheer skill and determination.

            There’s an underlying question in the story that amounts to “if you’ve made Earth such a great place, why is everyone trying to leave?”

            You’re misinterpreting the ending. Vincent always felt rejected by the world for being a natural but ends up feeling bittersweet for leaving as he found Irene and Jerome who proved to him that earth is very much capable of loving him. Not “everyone is trying to leave earth”, just Vincent really and even then he heavily diminishes his desire.


            I love Gattaca and really don’t understand your beef with it. It’s a beautiful story but awfully insightful too that aged perfectly even to this day! In fact, I’ll watch it again tonight :)

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not seen Gattaca, but a multi-tier, genetically structured society is the basis of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, which is well worth a read.

    • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Beggars Trilogy by Nancy Kress touches on this as well, but is more focused on the issues with superintelligence rather than just gene alteration, although, because people are vain, the preference for things like hair, skin and symmetry also exist in the story’s world. Oh yeah, and the coolest concept from this trilogy is a thing called “sleeplessness”, where people can alter there genes to remove the biological need to sleep, allowing people to be able to be productive for as many hours as they desire.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someone suffering from a terrible genetic disease that will kill me soon, any amount of preventing these diseases under any circumstances gets a thumbs up from me.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I think we should probably allow the technology that will prevent people being born with these diseases first, and then worry about how we’re going to deal with the other stuff. This technology isn’t going to be possible to hold back indefinitely anyway.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    As others have said, go see Gattaca. It’s completely about this topic and very interesting.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yah they already have inherited wealth and privilege, will it make ANY difference for the rest of us if their kids don’t get the diseases that they can afford to treat anyway?

      Lets say they do make ubermensch super-babies and create peak physical perfection… it will take generations before that creates enough of a class-divide that it will be noticable and by then, enough of them will have fucked around and bred with the common-folk that the edges of that divide are also going to get fuzzier and fuzzier. The world is full of rich people who mingle everywhere and are allowed to impregnate who they want and nobody cares.

      The only way you get the science-fiction dystopia with beautiful rich monsters with super powers versus the plucky gang of resistance fighters who are rough around the edges but have hearts of gold, is if you separate the wealthy elite out and make them live on Mars or something.

  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s a scarier thought, if they can fine tune this shit enough they’ll probably just clone themselves and pull a ship of Theseus on themselves. Removing the only remaining equalizer between them and the rest of humanity.

    The rich fucks at the top want to become gods. They won’t call it that but that’s the end game for the ones with the most hand on the wheel.

  • ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    This has been a thing for at least a few years. Luckily last I checked (pre pandemic) it hasn’t taken off bc

    1. Eugenics reminds people of Nazis and is bad
    2. Genetic diversity might be the only thing that saves us in another pandemic. Kind of like how strains of bananas all go extinct at once if they’re genetic clones.

    So probably too dangerous to actually take off any time soon. Iirc a Chinese scientist tried it and got sent to jail, seems to be a pretty universal thing

      • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s twins actually, Lulu and Nana. The gene editing might have increased their cognitive function.

        I don’t know why, but I cannot bring myself to condemn the editing.

  • triptrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    This happens in a smaller way with access to prenatal testing and abortions. Parents with access to those things are at least able to detect and avoid the more debilitating birth defect, while parents without access are more likely to have a child with a severe birth defect. If they’re already struggling materially, that can sometimes guarantee that both the parents and child will have no upward mobility.

  • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    This already happens with social factors that affect physical development like access to nutrition and a permanent place to live.

  • frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Beggars in Spain by Nancy Kress. A scifi that deals with the creation of classes based on whether you can afford to buy your children good genes. Politicians are charismatic, ruthless and good looking, because they are bred for politics. In this world people without genemods are sorta out of luck, without any of the tools or enhancements rich genemod people have.

    Or, check out GATTACA, good movie.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m compelled to mention every time GATTACA is mentioned, that the title is made up of the amino acids* that comprise our DNA: A,T,C,G

      *nucleic acids

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Despite being nearly 100 years old, Brave New World (1931), written by Aldous Huxley, covers the idea of class-based genetic engineering and genetics based class definition, as one of its core themes.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which is generally the problem with eugenics. No one is arguing that avoiding downs syndrome is a bad thing.

        • Blemgo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          And even then, editing out unwanted mutations can still stifle society as a whole and may be morally the wrong choice. For example, what about eradicating autism due to the immense pain these individuals receive due to our society? Is it better to change our society to accommodate people afflicted with it or wipe out the genes responsible for it if it is easier? And if we choose the latter, where is the cutoff point? Can we even tell when we crossed that line, where our drive to improve ourselves ended being done out of mercy and began to be about creating the model citizen?