• VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s honestly a really bad game to play. You either give in a little bit by trading at loss or you make everyone want to stop playing because there’s just no way to win and there’s absolutely no reason to play any further.

    Great for making kids fight, though.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      i mean yeah, that’s the point. The whole game was designed as a micro-cosm of capitalism. We’re in the endgame of monopoly right now, the richest players are buying out the entire board and it’s not fun for anyone else anymore. Only in the real world we can’t walk away from the table when the obvious winner insists they need to finish the game

    • ptu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wonder how a progressive tax on all income would change the game. Maybe divided between the participants or used however the participants voted. Winning mechanism would probably need to be changed to something other than whoever piles up the most cash and property.

      • meyotch@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suspect the game would just never end and properties would change hands again and again.

        Progressive taxation is a negative feedback that creates a tendency toward an equilibrium.

        Winner-take-all rules (as currently played) are positive feedbacks that lead to runaway effects, like me flipping over the board and setting up the slip and slide as a more pro-social activity.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    I get them meme and all but I’ve become MORE progressive as I’ve become wealthier. It opened my eyes to how rigged the system is.

    • Gustephan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      My first speeding ticket happened during college. I had to take a few weeks driving course, cut luxuries out of my life for a month, and pick up extra shifts at my job for a month to handle it. It was an overall miserable experience.

      My next speeding ticket happened while I was an engineer. I literally paid it off on my phone while the officer was doing paperwork on the side of the road AND gave them an extra $100 because I could do that instead of any kind of driving course. I stopped caring about it at all 10 minutes later. It was fucking wild to see “laws are only for the poors” in action like that

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      same here, and I’m hardly wealthy. true middle class.

      board games though? I’m gonna do my best to crush you

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks like someone wrote a pretty recent dissertation on the subject

    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=effect+of+wealth+on+greed+and+paranoia#d=gs_qabs&t=1753212816532&u=%23p%3DVAPTZ3dcNJQJ

    The Downside of Wealth: Toward a Psychopathology of Money Accumulation, Noah Laracy. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2017

    For a summary of a summary wealthy people have better health and quality of life, which shouldn’t surprise anyone due to the food, housing, access to healthcare, etc security money buys currently, and when controlling for age (comparing like aged individuals instead of only looking at wealth) paranoia increases with wealth.

    Full text https://www.proquest.com/openview/4e788e9e34bca1073784da0d0c99705e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750