• KingJalopy
      link
      fedilink
      386 days ago

      I moved to California last year from Oklahoma. Occasionally I will say something about moving from Oklahoma and people are like, “oh that makes sense, you have a Midwestern accent sometimes”. We all sound normal to ourselves but everyone has an accent. Like the way California people say their O’s.

      • The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        246 days ago

        Midwesterners are the only people I’ve ever met who don’t think they have an accent. And I’m like “you have a midwest accent.” They’re stunned because to them it’s just a “normal” accent, and they know it must be so because it’s what the TV man talks like. Obviously I know midwesterners who know they have an accent and the TV man is trained to speak that way. But everyone else I meet and know knows their own accent and can recognize variations of it. They’re not so conscious of how they make their accent happen, obviously, since it is their own. But they know they sound different from other people

        • @seralth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 days ago

          Part of that is, out side of a few regions of the Midwest that have a really unique accent.

          Most of the Midwest is “nutural English”. Yes there’s an accent, but there is a huge lack of slang, regional quirks, and is widely one of the most understandable accents across every English speaking country.

          It’s the “universal English accent” in a sense. It’s a large reason why call centers became so popular there. That and low costs.

          Functionally Midwestern accent is in a way the English that’s so boring that the banality of it IS the accent. Lol it’s kinda funny.

            • @seralth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 days ago

              No even when polled, British, Australian and Canadian find it easier to understand when spoken over the phone. When compared to any accent other than their own.

              Again it’s the reason it’s the most commonly used accent when you need a one size fit all solution and you can’t get a local accent for every region your servicing.

      • sebi
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I have a hard time understanding the people in a friends village and he lives 50km away

      • @sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 days ago

        Like the way California people say their O’s

        As a Canadian, it’s all I can hear when they speak.

      • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        So, I’m from Seattle, basically, and for the longest time I thought no, I do not have an accent.

        Then I learned that the reason I thought that was because well, the accent I have is basically the least distinct from the ‘General American English’ or ‘Region Indistinct American’ accent, out of all other regional accents…

        With that ‘General American’ accent being what nationwide newscasters, voice actors and movie stars either developed on their own, or were trained into, for being easily intelligible to any other American accent/dialect speaker, or as just sort of a rounded approximation of ‘American’, with no specified regionality to the character.

        Thats not to say the PNW or Cali or just general US West accents are all exactly the same as ‘General American’… they are not… its just that they are the least difficult to understand from a general audience perspective out of other regional US accents/dialects… or at least that is the explanation I’ve heard.

        As I am aware, the main difference between PNW/Cali English and other US regions is that we have completed the cot-caught merger. Absolutely no difference in pronunciation, the verb sounds are the same… whereas in much of the rest of the US, these are different, distinct vowel sounds. We just use the ‘cot’ pronounciation for both.

        Bot cot thot slot thought caught fraught not spot dot.

        All the same. No rolling or bending of the first vowel into the u to make a more complex vowel sound, all just ‘bot’ or ‘dot’.

        That and pop vs soda vs coke.

        For whatever reason, I usually say soda, but that did make me an oddball of most people around me near Seattle saying ‘pop’… but a lot of other places in the US use soda, but also a lot of other places use ‘coke’ to refer to any … soft drink… which confuses and aggrevates my Autistic brain lol.

        There are a few things that I remember being distinct to Californian accents/dialects as compared to Seattle:

        One is the rising tone at the end of the sentence… thing.

        I always called this a valley girl accent, and this is because no one I knew as a kid spoke that way… unless their family had recently moved north, from Cali.

        Now though, it is more common generally in the PNW, at least in my own experience… but also that could literally be because a lot of Californians have migrated north.

        Another silly, but super easy tell someone isn’t from Seattle: Their accent may be essentially indistinguishable from a PNW accent… but they always, always refer to I-5, as ‘the 5’… instead of ‘eye-five’.

        No one born and raised near Seattle does this.

        I-5 is the main highway that goes all the way down from Vancouver BC, through Seattle, Portland, San Fran, LA, and runs through all of those cities, so its a major reference point of conversation in all those places.

        And yeah, the regional vocab difference for how people refer to it is an example of a difference.

    • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 days ago

      I dated someone who in earnest believed she has no accent. She didn’t understand what could be wrong about that.

  • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    395 days ago

    Coming soon:

    What do you mean my US dollars aren’t accepted at any big intl. tourist locations anymore… I have to actually exchange them?

    • Rose
      link
      fedilink
      125 days ago

      And in the big touristy cities in Europe, there’s so many scam currency exchanges, while if you just take the time to go to official government exchanges, you get reasonable exchange rates. The problem isn’t the locals, the problem is that you didn’t do the research and you did a dum-dum. (Also fuck the people who are scamming tourists, that’s just low.)

    • The only places I’ve found that take USD are really poor places that really want USD, and maybe Mexico. Even some of those places will really take advantage of the exchange and you get way less than what the USD is worth if you just pay with USD.

      I travel all the time and tourist locations, barring the ones I mentioned, don’t want anything to do with handling USD when tapping a card or phone to pay is vastly preferred.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      At the risk of being that idiot ……

      I’m still annoyed at crossing a border over an international bridge and having to exchange currency to pay the toll. There’s a good argument that situation should support both currencies at that border.

      And of course the currency exchange at that toll did not allow exchanging the amount of the toll. Scammy ripoff of people trying to cross forcing them to exchange larger amounts than they need

      • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 days ago

        Oh no I don’t find that idiotic, that is very annoying, literally anywhere, between any two countries.

        I guess the workaround is to plan ahead and do your currency exchanges before hand, but at least in the US, if you do that in cash, well now you’re a drug smuggler or something if you’re brown and/or not in the best mood.

        I mean, everybody just has the ability to open up bank account debit/credit cards in multiple currencies, right?

        Your bank doesn’t do currency exchange?

        Not my problem, pleb, stay in your geographically confined area with a particular force of monopolized violence.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          35 days ago

          Bank currency exchange is not available if you don’t know to plan ahead, and may not be convenient ever

          There’s usually a $5 or more minimum, so less than that might as well be trash. Not convenient for tolls

          The only option at the border was an ATM, where you can withdraw currency, converted from your bank, but in $20 increments.

          Toll booths did not take credit cards or bank cards for an exact payment. This was before electronic tolling but that still might not be a thing at borders

  • Tomtits
    link
    fedilink
    English
    575 days ago

    No-one going to mention that they said countries and named two continents?

  • @sowitzer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    345 days ago

    I know it’s difficult to tell online, but I read that as a joke post. Not serious. But it’s better for others to make fun of others for being clueless I guess.

    • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      145 days ago

      Yeah. It always strikes me as bizarre how many people online see something that would only be satire in a sane world and completely assume it’s serious. They have no doubts. Never occurred to them it might be a joke…

        • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I feel like it should be more like “Poe’s sometimes true thing” because satire does indeed still exist. People making assumptions is the issue.

          • @ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            People making assumptions is the issue.

            There’s assumptions involved in detecting satire from just text as well. You would just have a Reverse Poe’s law where “any extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for satire of those views without clear indicator of the author’s intent”.

            Normally when people say or type things we (justifiably) assume that to be what they mean, which is why satire works much better when spoken because intonation can make the satire explicit without changing the words or saying it out loud.

            • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              25 days ago

              I never said anyone should assume something is satire. It’s possible to just not know something and not make a judgement.

              • @ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Never assumed you did :), but yes, as little assumptions is the best. But as you can already tell, it’s hard to communicate when you take no assumptions when people make explicit statements crafted to dispel assumptions, that are entirely plausible for a hypothetical real person to have.

                In fact, your original statement of “They have no doubts. Never occurred to them it might be a joke…”, is in itself a pretty big assumption. Unless, of course. I assume that statement to be a hyperbole, or even satire. But if we want to have fun talking about a shitpost we do kind of have to decide on an assumptive position on the meme that can’t talk back.

                • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 days ago

                  So yes, you have to make some assumptions. But to me it’s pretty clear that if someone is expressing anger at a possible joke that would be messed up if not a joke, they probably aren’t trolling/joking themselves. And then even if some people were, when you see people doing it en masse, I think it’s a safer assumption to assume no one gets the satire than it is for them to see a single random thing online and then get mad about what they think it means, when there are multiple possible interpretations

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      US used to be like that too. When polarized plugs first became a thing, they wouldn’t fit into older non-polarized outlets. It took decades for all those to be replaced and I’m sure they’re still out there. Somewhere

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 days ago

        Still I have one (1) in a stairwell in my house. So far I’ve left it alone, partially because it also has a stupid piece of stair molding blocking part of its cover plate but mostly because I have never in all my years found any reason to plug anything in there.

        Somebody probably originally intended it to be for a vacuum cleaner or something, but even the corded ones I’ve owned have had cords more than long enough to reach both ends of the stairs from a selection of other nearby, non-stupid outlets.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        For power In the U.S. I have to use USB-A, USB-C, Lightning, cigarette lighter adapter, 110 plug without ground, 110 with ground, 220 - 3 types of connectors on those just for dryers, adapters still for mini USB, micro USB, and that’s all before we start to get obscure. Universal lightbulb plugs? Nah everyone had to fuck that up as well.

  • @Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    34 days ago

    The funny thing is only the UK plug design is any good, all others are so much worse they should just give up and go home.

  • @JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    106 days ago

    The Type I plug was developed by the US government but blocked in Congress during the FDR administration by the Republicans and southern Democrats on the basis that it was a change from the multiple different outlets being used at the time. The 3 core plug didn’t become standard until 1965.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      55 days ago

      If you want a bulky replaceable plug, you can get those at any hardware store. Meanwhile I’ll take the smaller more reliable, more durable and waterproof molded plastic plug

  • @anachrohack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    55 days ago

    Thailand has really cool plugs. they’re shaped so they can fit European or American outlets, quite often. I rarely needed an adapter when I was there

        • @tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          55 days ago

          Yes for electronic devices that expect low voltage DC and have a converter, like laptops, phone chargers, etc.

          But don’t try and take a 120V hairdryer on holiday and plug it in because it will certainly blow up.

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            15 days ago

            You definitely need to distinguish “electrical” devices from “electronic” devices but a safer approach is to read the plug.

            • A power supply (ex. Phone charger) will be stamped with a voltage range and power draw, which probably includes everywhere but you can match it against the electrical service where you are. You may need a plug adapter but a simple mechanical adapter is sufficient.
            • an electrical appliance (ex. Hair dryer) plug is probably not stamped with electrical requirements so the safe approach is to only use it in the intended country