• 🇨🇦 holdstrong
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1092 months ago

    The US is threatening to invade a democratic nation and nobody seems to care. Where are all the freedom loving dudebros on this? Subjugating free countries is okay now? This is so exhausting

  • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    90
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The minute we set foot in a sovereign country with intent to seize, we’ll be sanctioned into the ground by NATO. It will be completely warranted, yet Trump will somehow convince MAGA that they’re ‘attacking’ us economically.

    • Gordon Calhoun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Of all the people to blindly believe and follow, why him? Absolutely nothing I’ve seen about him even hints a wisp of “you can trust me” vibe. Did he do something amazing on The Apprentice? I never watched that screen feces, so I don’t know what was portrayed. I can only assume it was something spellbinding and miraculous based on the cultist compulsion millions of human brains seem to exhibit.

      Or did they all just hate Hillary Clinton or Obama SO MUCH that it permanently broke their brains?

      • @FatsoJackson@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 months ago

        Or did they all just hate Hillary Clinton or Obama SO MUCH that it permanently broke their brains?

        don’t underestimate how incredibly racist and sexist some parts of the states are

      • DominusOfMegadeus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 months ago

        He tells the shitty people that their hate is good and proper, so they convince themselves that his actions are correct.

      • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        Of all the people to blindly believe and follow, why him?

        Trump openly promises fascism in terms stupid enough that fascists can understand.

        There’s not much more to it.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      I assume you mean a western country with intent to seize, because we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and NATO supported those campaigns.

    • @in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Then Trump will be legally allowed to invade the hague.

      “The United States is not a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The American Service-Members’ Protection Act authorizes the President of the United States to use “all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court”. This authorization led to the act being nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act”,[4] since the act would allow the president to order military action in The Hague, the seat of the ICC, to prevent American or allied officials and military personnel from being prosecuted or detained by the ICC.[5]”

      EDIT - While I realize this doesn’t apply to sanctions, it still sets a scary precedent for checking USA’s actions.

        • @alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          While NATO’s Article 5 states that an attack on one member is an attack on all, it does not mandate a specific response, but rather each member decides what actions it deems necessary to assist the attacked member.

          Besides, Panama is not a NATO member.

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          that’s not really relevant here since panama isn’t a NATO member

            • Lysol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 months ago

              Canada is also a member of the Commonwealth, so the UK would pretty much be forced to go to war against the US if Canada was invaded.

  • @BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 months ago

    “Panama should abandon its accommodating policy towards the U.S., which can only lead to escalating demands”

    Why do countries have to figure this out so slowly

  • @usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 months ago

    Watch for any movement / build up of troops. He could still be bluffing here, but this is more than what he’s done for other places as far as I’m aware. His actions and orders from here out will be much more telling than any of his words will be

  • FauxPseudo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    In the interests of national security we should always have a plan to seize the Panama Canal because of its strategic importance during a war. It would be irresponsible to not have such a plan.

    But this is irresponsible on a completely different level. This is “let’s invade Iraq” level stupidity. Trump ran on not having started any wars in his prior term. He ran on ending existing wars. Now that he is in he has talked about starting wars with all our neighbors and other allies. He doesn’t call them wars but that’s what they would be.

    Here is a map of each place he has threatened. Instead of protecting our national security he is a threat to it. The president is a threat to national security. We got here because the cult of personality was determined to defeat the opposition even if they destroyed themselves in the process. They have fucked us all to own the libs. Even if Trump left office today it would take us decades to recover from the damage he has done to us.

    • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      Even if Trump left office today it would take us decades to recover from the damage he has done to us.

      YUP. Our allies will never trust us - how could they share sensitive and secret information with the asshole country that let a former pres store national secrets in his fucking bathroom?

      they shouldn’t trust us. 5 eyes my ass…

    • @Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      IDK, if it were Iraq levels of stupidity, the Democrats would become completely on board. This is a rare break with imperialism, because, also, Democrats usually would be on board with any support of fascism in Latin America (e.g. Pinochet, Operation Condor, etc.). We are finding extremely rare exceptions to right-wing stupidity that the Democrats wont agree and sign-off on.

      Edit: And here I was constantly pointing out that the Democrats completely gave up any pretense of being an opposition party. Maybe they have finally found some difference between post 2024 Democrats and Trump in terms of policy.