cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • @HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    270
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

  • The 8232 Project
    link
    fedilink
    1065 months ago

    This is very bad news, because this means any app that wants your data could do the same.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      1005 months ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • @themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        455 months ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Err, you could firewall an app from your data in Private Space or Shelter for older Android versions. That should work on any Android device.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    815 months ago

    Odd timing considering I’ve banned McDonalds, Revolut and Authy from my phone.

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    685 months ago

    McDonalds? Uber?

    They both have fully functioning webapps btw.

    • Wilmo Bones
      link
      fedilink
      English
      415 months ago

      Right people who install various apps like McDonalds apps etc, are these even typical to GrapheneOS users? I’d think most would avoid superfluous data stealing apps.

      • @HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        135 months ago

        I’ve been thinking of switching the GrapheneOS. I certainly enjoy my privacy, and are taking steps to move to sources that don’t harvest my data. Outside of YouTube and android I’ve completely degoogled myself, even replaced Maps with magic earth and OsmAnd. I even swapped full time to linux a handful of months ago as a gamer with a VR interest. But I’m not so hardcore to not use any service that might sell my data. I still use vanilla firefox, food ordering apps, and discord for example. So while I’m not someone who goes to extreme lengths to protect my data, moving over to GrapheneOS doesn’t seem like a huge inconvenience compared to the gains you get.

    • Sips'OP
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Sorry but it seems I might have been mistaken by calling out Uber on this one. Thought i read about Uber during this but I cant find back to it. Have changed the title.

  • @zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    525 months ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

    • @kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      915 months ago

      which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones

      The point of the Google Play Integrity API is to ensure that the user is not in control of their phone, but that one of a small number of megacorps are in control.

      Can the user pull their data out of apps? Not acceptable. Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable. Can the user modify apps? Not acceptable.

      Basically it ensures that the user has no control over their own computing.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

        • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s used to help secure the businesses app yes. It helps with things like preventing resource abuse which would cost the company money. E.g. querying mass amounts of data on a loop to increase the companies bill.

      • @zako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        If you install GrapheneOS, you do not need root, so GrapheneOS is in control of the phone not the user. The key here is if GrapheneOS is secure enough to be certified by Google Play Integrity API. is it security or other issue? perhaps Google is not supporter of FOSS ROMs, perhaps it is not fun of how GrapheneOS removes permissions to Google Apps, …

        If it is not security, this is a kind of monopoly to control which ROMs are allowed to run apps.

  • @penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    425 months ago

    Webapps everything you can like I do with Firefox and ublock origin. Fuck these assholes.

  • @BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    395 months ago

    OK McDonald’s, I will not use your most cost effective ordering method. I guess I will just have to order my 10 individually custom cheeseburgers at the counter instead. I might have to have e the order read back, and change my mind about a few burgers.

    • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      895 months ago

      As a former employee… That does nothing. Crazies that spend 15 min to order some fries were common.

      If you go at rush hour it can be annoying to the employee and other customers, but at the end of the day nobody will remember and you would have spent 20 min and 10 dollars (which is 9 dollars material profit for MacDonald).

      Just. Don’t. Go. To. Macdonald’s.

    • bountygiver [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      that’s just screwing with the workers though, and the workers sure as hell is not going to get paid extra for your custom order

      • @Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        65 months ago

        This viewpoint is so stupid.

        The cashier is paid to take orders, whether they take 1 long obnoxious order or 3 small orders, it’s the same shit.

        People are so swept up in ‘kindness and support’ (internet circlejerking), they think that the fact you inconvenienced some 17 year old, representing a massive corporation, as a fuck you to the company that employs them, you’ve committed some moral sin against your fellow man.

        • @neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          That worker doesn’t want to be there, that’s likely one of 3 jobs they need to barely scrape by.

          You holding them up from doing other tasks they need to do to keep a job that barely feeds them is doing nothing but making their day a little harder. It affects the company 0%. The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

          I don’t know what the answer is aside from not patronizing the company at all, but I know that’s not it.

          • @Lag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            55 months ago

            If the company is always too busy, they will need to hire more workers or the existing ones will leave.

            • @neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              I highly doubt it, if the store is too busy they’ll likely either do nothing because why would they or if it’s really bad add some robots who can handle the workload so they can get rid of those pesky employees.

              In the past few years almost all of the fast food places in the closest plaza to me have been working on a skeleton crew. Lines wrapped around the building, 2 miserable employees, upset customers, but the money is still coming in.

              Most people can’t just leave their job, even a days wage can crush a lot of people.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

            Hey now, sometimes the company employs security that’s extremely bored, incredibly racist, and looking for a low income punching bag to hassle.

        • GHiLA
          link
          fedilink
          -65 months ago

          the cashier

          Who is also the manager, making drinks, doing the fries because that bitch called in sick…

  • @AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    385 months ago

    This surprises me because McDonald’s app is hands down the worst app I’ve ever encountered in the history of all Android apps.

    It’s is sluggish, ignores touches/taps half the time, doesn’t adhere to Android best practices for flow, crashes a lot, errors a lot, etc.

    But OK McDonald’s. Fuck off.

  • HiramFromTheChi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I can’t prove it, but I’m 99% sure Lyft did the same thing. Had a perfect rating (and was even a driver at one point), and they banned me without explanation right after I switched to GrapheneOS.

    Emailed them a few times asking for the reason, and they refused to tell me.

    _"Legally, we cannot release any additional information except that we found your account to be violating our Terms of Service.

    We will be in touch if we are able to reopen your account in the future."_

    There’s absolutely nothing else that they could’ve misconstrued as “violating the Terms of Service.”

    If Uber’s going down the same path, no more ride-sharing for me I guess. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

      • HiramFromTheChi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        No idea. Gonna try to stick to the web app instead and hold off updating the native mobile app for as long as possible.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There’s no reason a company couldn’t release the info legally unless it was under something like AML (anti money laundering) laws and you were flagged as a criminal. They legally can’t disclose why in that case.

      Using a different OS isn’t reason enough, if they were telling the truth about the legal restrictions.

  • @Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    265 months ago

    Why would anyone load an app from McDonalds? You want to give them elevated access to your most personal data for a few dollars of coupons?

    What are they taking from you that’s worth more than the discounts they are giving you? Because they are definitely making a profit, or they wouldn’t be doing it.

    • Sips'OP
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      We are definitely in the era where people think discounts before user privacy. I bet most of people downloading the Mcdonald app do it exactly because of cheeper prices and easy of access.

    • @FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      I used to work hosting Focus Groups, we would pay cash, and top dollar for even small chunks of specific data sets on demographics that would age very quickly. Since people’s habits change, different trends, feedback, etc. Hence the need of constant campaigns. Today, people give a lot of this data away, for free, in a constant data stream, for months if not years on end for cents or even a couple of bucks a month. Via constant tracking and profiling. It’s crazy how privacy illiterate people are.