• @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1088 months ago

    That’s what USB-A to USB-C cables are for. Most of those outlets don’t provide any fast charging anyway.

      • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        168 months ago

        So you plug an A to C cable into them (or hang an A to C dongle off the end of your usual cable) and charge from them.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        I still run across them that charge at 1.0 speeds. I’m pretty sure if my phone isn’t turned off they can’t actually keep my phone from dying at idle.

        • @oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          My car had USB for Android Auto and it barely provides enough enough power to maintain my phone’s charge while in use.

          Thankfully wireless charging makes that an easy problem to bypass.

    • @aulin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      Wait. I thought they were saying it’s annoying that there are now USB-C outlets replacing USB-A, which would be a waste. They actually want USB-C outlets?! I’d guess at least half of all USB-C cables are USB-A to USB-C. There’s absolutely no reason to switch from A-outlets.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        USB-c are more convenient and have a wider range of uses. We should be moving to that for everything.

        Actually I was disappointed last year …. After reading for so long that Apple was the last remaining holdout for usb-c, I switched my phone and watch, and have been wondering where everyone else is. Why is it still the minority to find USB-C power strips and chargers and power banks and outlets and random devices? In my case, it means I don’t have a clean switch from Lightning to USB-C but now have to buy legacy cables too

        • @aulin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          USB-c are more convenient and have a wider range of uses.

          How? Since USB-C has been around for so long, A-C cables have been the norm from the start. Everyone has them already. I don’t see the downside.

            • @aulin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              I had to look up what that means. Does it really matter that much? We have fast chargers using A-C cables for phones since far back. Is PD that much better?

          • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            The symmetry and not needing to glance at the end of the plug (or rotate it several times to figure out if it’s rotated wrong or just isn’t aligned properly) is nice.

          • @lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Sure, but recently (the last two years actually sound about right) we have been starting to replace A-C cables with C-C cables and often with fast and small GaN powerbricks that are USB-C out.

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Those of us who never had to buy them now have to for backward compatibility. That especially includes us iPhone people who are new to the party and have to buy both the newer standard and the older. There are a lot of iPhone people.

            For anyone, you have to carry double the number of cables. You might find a modern charger or you might find an older one.

            Are you asking why USB-C is more convenient? It’s smaller, it’s reversible, it carries more power, it has faster data …. How’s it not more convenient?

            • @aulin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Those of us who never had to buy them now have to for backward compatibility. That especially includes us iPhone people who are new to the party and have to buy both the newer standard and the older. There are a lot of iPhone people.

              That’s more of an Apple issue than a USB issue, imo.

              For anyone, you have to carry double the number of cables. You might find a modern charger or you might find an older one.

              I agree that’s annoying. But again, once the transition started, C-C cables came with A-C adapters. Those still exist.

              Are you asking why USB-C is more convenient? It’s smaller, it’s reversible, it carries more power, it has faster data …. How’s it not more convenient?

              The size difference is minimal. If you’re saying you can bring a C-C cable but not an A-C cable, I don’t believe you. Reversible is just a matter of flipping it if it’s wrong. USB-A still has up to 30 W. Do you really need fast charging in public outlets? Data is moot, since we’re talking about charging and ideally even using non-data cables to avoid unintentional data transfer.

              • @AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                I want to bring only one cable that does everything, and I don’t want to worry about plugging it in backwards

              • @oatscoop@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Do you really need fast charging in public outlets?

                I always bring my own charger or power pack with me for security and speed, but “yes”.

                If I’m using a public outlet my device is nearly dead and I probably only have limited time to hang out and charge it.

    • @Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      408 months ago

      It’s not so much the connector; but the power delivery standard.

      Type A maxes out at 5v 3a = 15w and is often limited closer to 5v 1a = 5w for public-use charging ports.

      Type C and its power delivery standards can get as high as 50v 5a = 250w (though usually closer to 20v 5a = 100w)

      Then again… The negotiation for what voltage/amperage to supply happens over the data lines which you don’t want connected on a public charging port…

      I dont really see a good solution here.

        • @Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes, obviously that’s always been an option.

          I dont see a good solution for the topic we were actually talking about: creating high-power public use charging ports.

          • @myplacedk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Charge the powerbank with the public charger. No data to steal, no expensive phone with sensitive electronics to break.

            • @med@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              One day, I’m sure there will be a defcon talk about reprogramming powerbanks to fry devices.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      Of course they have heard of those cables. They very likely own a few themselves.

      It would be nice to only have to carry a single C-C cable in your bag though.

  • @mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    678 months ago

    Idk. Like all the usb ports were capped at like 5v 1a with shorted data lines. I always used my own charger just because it would take 6 hours to charge my phone using the built in usb plug.

    • @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      This is why next to my couches are multi-port chargers.

      The ones I’m using currently have 8 ports; 2 at 65W, 3 at 30W, and 3 at 20W. The 30 & 60 are USB-C, 20W is USB A. The 65W is plenty for laptops, tablets, and phones. 30W for tablets and phones if the 65W is in use or headphones, eBook reader, etc. 20W for all that miscellaneous simple device charging, anything micro USB, etc.

      Way better strategy than built in IMO. Easy to replace, old one goes somewhere else (or given to family members), etc.

      • @T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Also great to squeak a little battery in if your phone was flat and you needed to make a call.

  • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    298 months ago

    As an anarchist I’m so glad we also made the word universal useless by making all kinds of different power and data transmit standards that ports and cables may or may not support. As a Satanist I also love that there is no system for labeling anything to know what cable will support what protocol.

      • @PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Chargers are almost always compatible with any a/c voltage and only need a physical adapter to plug into a wall socket in a different country. Or bring a power bank with you

      • @hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        I’ve got a brick for EU/UK/USA/AUS plugs with 3 type a and 1 type c and an international multiplug ac/ac pass through.

    • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      I’m a PD evangelist. Imagine a safer power delivery system that can go directly to the device you want powered. Scale that with fact most of the world could be and should be DC with AC being good just for niche applications like microwaves and mid range transmissions.

      • @mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        You say most of the word should be DC I till you realize that you need a 3cm thick cable to move 2000w 30m. DC is really bad outside of low or ultra high power transmission.

        • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The calculator I used says for 48v with an acceptable drop of 3v at 50 amp (2400-2250 watts) would be a 0 (1/0) AWG or .82515cm diameter diameter wire to handle the current (oversized really but it’s napkin math lol) for 30m.

      • @pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Tell me you don’t understand how electrical transformers work without telling me you don’t know understand electrical transformers work.

        • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Listen I don’t wanna just rag on you, because you came at me with bait and what feels like an a condescending attempt to sound smart.

          Do you mind just explaining what you are thinking and we could just talk about it? Transformers are fucking awesome, fucking magmatsm and shit, tons of uses. I think there is some interesting discussion here if you actually want to have it.

  • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    178 months ago

    Yeah. This is the problem with trying to enforce standards on industries that historically move at glacier speed, with standards used by tech moving at breakneck speeds.

    The only happy part of USB-C in this context is that, at least right now, the USB-C connector doesn’t seem to be going anywhere anytime soon, so if things get updated to USB C, we should be okay for a while.

    Personally, I carry a whole assortment of USB cables with me everywhere. C-to-C, A-to-C, even A-to-lightning, and A-to-microB. I don’t use an iPhone, nevermind one that needs a lightning cable. And I have moved away from most accessories that require micro.

    I also have a power brick in my pack with the cables, it’s a GaN power brick from Anker, with over 100W of output, two USB-C outputs, and one USB-A. At least one of the type C ports supports enough power output to charge my laptop, the other USB C port for my phone, and the USB A port for anything else that might need it. I don’t recall the exact power capacity of it, but if memory serves, it will take 100-240V, 50-60hz AC input, so at most, I just need to get one of those cheap converters for the receptacle type used wherever I may find myself.

    I work in tech, so being without power is a huge problem. My work laptop also takes USB C for charging, so I don’t need to have two power bricks with me. I usually have both, but I don’t need to have both.

    As long as there’s power available and is sufficiently clean and stable, I’m good. I have a few accessories that are not USB C compliant, some have USB C ports but won’t trigger a proper USB C charger to deliver any power, which is why I have USB A to C cables, and there’s two devices I have that uses a proprietary cable (a Bluetooth headset and my smart watch), which I’ve obtained spares for which I keep one charging cable at home and one in my kit. My kit also includes a USB A/C power bank. It’s not powerful enough to charge my laptop, but it’s fine for everything else.

    USB C has simplified the cables I carry. I still have a few odds and ends for edge cases, but for the most part, I’m okay with it.

    My only big issue with USB C at this point is that it’s not just for power+usb data anymore. It’s thunderbolt, and display port, and… Ugh. So many things using the same connector that I don’t know what will work anymore when I get to a new device, because though it looks like USB C, it might be USB C QC, or PD, or thunderbolt, or display port, or… FML.

      • Trailblazing Braille Taser
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        Everybody get ready for the dual release of USB-360 and USBONE. USB-360 is gonna be shaped like an octagon, but only two orientations work. USBONE is a nonagon but slightly larger so USB-360 just fits inside because fuck you.

      • @dnick@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Seems like a reasonable chance, kind of the first universal end, and it doubles as a two sided option. Micro was nearly there if it hasn’t been so horrid on the physical hardware side.

  • Pasta Dental
    link
    fedilink
    English
    118 months ago

    USB-A ports have been outdated since at least 2017, when it started seeing very widespread use. It’s everyone else that’s late

  • @Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    I have a piece of furniture with a snap in power station and it probably has USB 1.0 ports on it. I don’t care how cool the tech is, if you’re trying to incorporate it into a long lasting product like furniture, it really needs to be a standard module that is easy to upgrade. Mine snaps out but I have no idea if an updated version exists anywhere because there’s no standardization and this furniture company doesn’t show anything on their website.

    • @xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      I’d prefer non-corporate internationally approved standards over modularity. We were able to do it with CAT/ITU …

  • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    Still better having new universal standards come out over time (as requirements exceed the capabilities of the previous standards) than having a different one for each company or device.

    • The Picard ManeuverOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      108 months ago

      I actually looked it up before making this post, because any time someone uses either version of the word, this comes up in the comments. Apparently both “sike” and “psych” are considered correct, although it seems like “sike” is more commonly used, so I went with that one.

      • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Oh c’mon, we had a whole show, a very good one, that should have taught everyone how to spell PSYCH! correctly. I sentence you to go watch it, all of it, including the movies. 🍍🍍🍍🍍🍍

        • Ech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          The show name is a pun…

          • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            The show is clever and so is its name, which is indeed a pun playing on psych(ic)/psych (out). The bravado of calling your fake psychic agency “fooled you!” is perfectly in character for Sean.

        • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 months ago

          It’s not reallya misspelling. It’s an alternate spelling for a different form of the word. A word that started colloquially. Either way, several words have multiple accepted spellings even outside of regional stuff like color/colour. Pallet and palette are two normal spellings of that word with different main meanings but nigh equivalent over-all meanings, for example. I know I’ve ran in to many more, but the brain’s still starting up…

          • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            Pallet and palette are homophones, but the different words have distinctly different meanings.

            The problem is the pervasive proliferation of improper phrasing

              • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Nope.

                Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more pal·let1 noun a straw mattress. a crude or makeshift bed. Tip Similar-sounding words pallet is sometimes confused with palette

  • @Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 months ago

    I have a piece of furniture with a snap in power station and it probably has USB 1.0 ports on it. I don’t care how cool the tech is, if you’re trying to incorporate it into a long lasting product like furniture, it really needs to be a standard module that is easy to upgrade. Mine snaps out but I have no idea if an updated version exists anywhere because there’s no standardization and this furniture company doesn’t show anything on their website.

    • clif
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I enjoy the A to C converter on the side that you didn’t explicitly call out. Nice easter egg :D

      • @Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Haha. That wasn’t on purpose, I swear! It’s also connected to the even-more-unique C to Micro converter. I actually needed to dig out my USB mini cable the other day.