It often feels like there are only 3 productive hours in typical American white collar work day.
What if we just cut out the rest?
Edit: Some great responses. So responses must have also been said about the 5 day and 40 hour work weeks.
After 3 hours you’d go to your next job.
Then you miss out the unmentioned part of the work - idle thinking. Not only the time spent typing something on the keyboard is work. All the time spent thinking how to solve a problem is also work.
All the time spent thinking how to solve a problem is also work.
try telling that to every manager i’ve ever had.
Or the fact that most jobs are not behind desks or keyboard…
That’s not how my employer measures productivity. They use keystrokes per minute. Gotta get good at idle typing.
“I got no work done at all today, it was all back to back meetings!”.
My wife, regularly.
This is true. I tend to do my best thinking away from work, and not part of my current work time.
As a non-white-collar worker, I always find conversations like this very alienating. The idea of being on the clock while not working is bizarre to me.
That’s why a lot of roles like this are salaried. My productivity can’t be measured by how fast I turn a crank.
Why would you be on the clock? You work 3 hours and that pays enough money.
morning coffee, break, afternoon coffee, go home
you get up at 12 and start to work at 1, take an hour for lunch and then at 2 you’re done.
What about my 15 minute breaks?
To be honest, while I feel while this is true for many jobs, we should also keep the people whose jobs where this isn’t possible in mind.
Sadly we are so obsessed with squeezing “productivity” en masse out of the workforce. We rarely justify technology or process enhancements that result in fewer hours worked. We generally optimize how much we get out of each hour worked. I have always had an issue with this.
Take AI for example, we are seeing some tasks automated or accelerated by AI powered tools. However, I have not heard any employers state how their employees will be able to get their work done in fewer hours. I only ever hear how people will get more done during their work hours.
The system in this way is very much broken. In an ideal world, you’d get paid for the outcome and not the hours worked, but that is not a working relationship many outside of entrepreneurs and consultants have.
I think the problem would be getting everyone’s 3 hours to line up.
Yes. A whole lot more would need to be asynchronous.
You couldn’t organise anything. I honestly can’t see how h the status quo can be changed.
I’m not sure I could condense my work like that. If I have 3 hours of work I want at least 4 hours to do it in. And if you decide you can condense it, employers will simply double everyone’s workload, and we are not computers. Maybe 3 hours of work is all anyone can do in a day, and some of us can do it in 3:15 but most of us like to spread it over 8. Plus there are insights that only come in non-active time, again, we aren’t machines.
i think there’s a different “sweet spot” for everyone. i agree, doing 3h of productivity in 3h is hard enough, but i wouldn’t necessarily need to stretch it over 8h, i’d do fine with 5-6h. my last work hours tend to be the most unproductive ones anyway
It sounds great! The real trick would be finding any company willing to pay the same 40 hours of wages every week for 15 hours of work. There’s not much point to a 3 hour work day if you have work 3 different jobs
I think logistics job titles would be numerous and intense.
Like, not office work, but with my auto body business in the past. I can absolutely crush it in a day when all the pieces come together. While I may only be working an average of 3 hours a day, my time is spent moving pieces around. I might be able to knock out $2500 in a day, but this is a stupid number. It doesn’t account for my 75% overhead, or how it took all week to setup all that work that happened to align with one day of intense effort. Never trust anyone saying what they can make in a day, week, or month with their business. What they did on their best day has no bearing on their average.
I get the skeptical impression that these shortened hours figures neglect the setup and true nature of most jobs. Like some grad student went to an office for a week, took notes, and extrapolated meaning that lacks perspective, but I could be wrong.
When painting, I’m much more effective in a shorter amount of time but it wasn’t a choice.
Personally, long term, I think we are beginning to recognise the barbarism behind allowing a complex social hierarchy to develop based on the fundamental human need for survival. There are other forms of complex hierarchical display that do not kill people and oppress billions. Some examples are awards based accolades in academia and performing arts, another is merit from physical performance in events and Olympics. This will ultimately happen in the distant future. A wealth based social hierarchy is unethical barbarism if you step outside of cultural norms and objectively assess the ethics. The hard part is always convincing the winners to step aside and play a new game with new rules.
You raised a number of great points. I won’t address all of them.
Setup and organizing parts/resources would need attention. Deliveries, messages, and decisions would all need adjustments. I expect that while one may work 3 hours a day, they may not be the same 3 hours every day, or even continuous.
Some meetings are BS while others are legitimately helpful - I think a 3 hr day would make those good meetings hard to squeeze in.
