US President Joe Biden has condemned Iranian attacks on military facilities in Israel, pledging a coordinated Group of Seven (G7) diplomatic response while highlighting the United States’s help in taking down “nearly all” of the attacking drones and missiles.

Biden, who cut short a trip to Delaware and returned to Washington, DC to meet advisers over the late Saturday night attack, said in a statement released by the White House that the US forces and facilities had not been hit.

The US president said he reiterated the “ironclad” support for Israel’s security in a call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he has had strained relations over Israel’s handling of the war in Gaza.

“Tomorrow, I will convene my fellow G7 leaders to coordinate a united diplomatic response to Iran’s brazen attack,” he said.

“And while we have not seen attacks on our forces or facilities today, we will remain vigilant to all threats and will not hesitate to take all necessary action to protect our people,” he said.

Archive link

    • @GrymEdm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Jesus Christ the opening to that video had me guessing for a moment until I calmed down and realized it’s obviously a hypothetical. Given that it’s reported that Iranian officials consider their attack “concluded”, it would be great if all the players stepped away from escalation into open war. The video I linked talks about the pressure on both Iran and Israel to back down, and here’s hoping they do. The world really really doesn’t need yet another open war in the Middle East, USA-involved or otherwise.

    • halyk.the.red
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I think it would be an incredibly unpopular decision by Biden, and the American people would not support a war with Iran. I also think that it would be a tactical mistake, given how many US assets are within Iranian striking distance right now. The US military is having recruiting issues currently, and a war will not help that.

      However, I wouldn’t be surprised to see ISIS attacks in Iran start to happen more frequently.

      • @Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Of course it will be more sanctions, more pressure to other countries to denounce Iran, more proxy war with funding literal terrorist groups and telling them to hit whoever the US doesn’t like, also probably bomb a few Iranian assests because what actually can they do?

        An open war rather requires justified claims. It is gruesome and the horrible results are directly tied to the war. A combination of sinister proxy war, subterfuge, coercion and forced poverty are slow killers and will have way fewer dissidents. It is the name of the game for half of the US oppression policing on the world.

    • @Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I feel like that wouldn’t go down well if the US government tried that.

      Maybe I don’t understand the average American, but it’s certainly seemed like people realized the last wars in the Middle East were a waste of time and life.

      • @Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        This might’ve mattered if the state worked for the people, but the only people a bourgois/liberal “democracy” serves are the capitalists. And the US MIC would love more war.

  • @LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s crazy about this whole situation is Iran attacked Israel because Israel bombed Iran’s embassy in Syria killing a general and 6 others… and governments are telling Iran not to overreact.

    Like bruh, how would you react if your embassy was bombed in a 3rd country killing your general and 6 other nationals

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      And somehow the elected leader of our country is going against the will of the population by supporting israel and dragging us into another massive war.

  • @Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 year ago

    Iran has kept their end of the bargain of not attacking US targets. Of course the US does not keep theirs of not interfering, and shoots down Iranian drones instead.

    In a written message to Washington, Iran “warned the US not to get dragged into Netanyahu’s trap”, Mohammad Jamshidi, the Iranian president’s deputy chief of staff for political affairs, wrote on X, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The US should “step aside so that you don’t get hit”.

    “In response, the US asked Iran not to hit American targets,” Jamshidi said.

    • ReallyKinda
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      Related to bargaining, I read the wiki article on Iran’s nuclear program the other day and was surprised at how hard they are trying to do their nuclear program “by the book” while the US keeps blocking everyone else from agreeing that they’re entitled as long as they follow the guidelines (paris agreement etc).

      • @Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Literally this

        Iran needs to get nukes fast. The US will be itching for war until it does.

        • @Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          This is why I was cheering when North Korea got nukes.

          North Korea is a horrific shit show but war against North Korea would almost certainly end in direct conflict with China.

          Now that NK has nukes there is zero risk of the West initiating a conflict. The risk is too high.

          Any change in NK will need to happen internally or by pressure from their allies. Which sucks for the NK people but is probably still less horrific than war.

          • @Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The current problems in the DPRK stem from the brutal sanctions. Prior to the USSR’s overthrow when the sanctions had far less effect, the North was developing and urbanizing faster than the South, even with 20% of its population killed, and all its infrastructure destroyed, by the US.

            Agree with you on the nukes of course. The DPRK would’ve ended up like Libya is right now and the US might have been at war against China if they didn’t develop their nuclear deterrence.

            • @Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              The highest managerial authority under the Taean system is the party committee. Each committee consists of approximately twenty-five to thirty-five members elected from the ranks of managers, workers, engineers, and the leadership of “working people’s organizations” at the factory.

              Workplace democracy in action.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              Well this has got to be one of the least persuasive things I’ve ever read:

              A measure of the success of the Taean Work System is its longevity and its continued endorsement by the leadership. In his 1991 New Year’s address marking the thirtieth anniversary of the creation of the system, Kim Il Sung said that the "Taean work system is the best system

    • @ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -151 year ago

      The USA didn’t say they wouldn’t interfere. The opposite was said, actually. Iran has in fact targeted a US Base before although they did give warning ahead of time.

      You’re just making shit up OP.

    • po-lina-ergi
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly at this point anybody who needs Trump not to win should be organising their life as if he already has and will come into office next January.

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        I always say the Berlin wall went up overnight, don’t wait for things to get worse before planing your escape.

    • @sandman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not voting for Biden.

      Fuck the lesser evil.

      If this upsets any of you, get mad at the democrats who keep nominating these shit candidates.

      Give me someone like Bernie or I will not vote democrat. I will not fall in line. If that means a Trump victory, then so be it.

      You’ll only have yourselves to blame just like when you nominated Hillary.

  • @Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    “All Joe Biden had to do was stay the fuck out of the middle east for a few months and the election was his…”

    • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      The US has been tied to Israel since its founding.

      No matter who (or what party) was in the white house, the US would be propping up Isreal after the Hamas attack.

      Just like it has done for decades.

    • @Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Plenty of 3rd party candidates to vote for. No one is forcing you to vote for Biden but every vote for Biden is telling him that it’s OK to keep doing what he’s doing. A vote for Biden is a vote for Genocide.

        • @Woozythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          No, a vote for 3rd party is quite literally a vote for 3rd party. Stop shaming people because they don’t want to vote for your candidate. If Biden wants people to vote for him then he needs to earn it. Dems can’t just do nothing for anyone and fund a genocide and expect to win on being the lesser evil.

          • SeaJ
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Sorry but that is not really how our system works. Feel free to advocate for changes to our voting like ranked choice but until then voting strategically is the only real way to go. Voting third party as a protest vote does not do shit. It does not get the Democratic party to change their platform. Vote for a progressive candidate in the primaries of you want something to actually change in the Democratic party. Neither major party actually cares about third parties. The last time a third party candidate got a large chunk of the vote was Perot and neither party changed positions afterwards.

            You can vote for a super progressive third party candidate in the election but that helps out the candidate least like your position if you are in a swing state. If you are not in a swing state, vote however the fuck you want because your vote largely means nothing until we change how voting works.

              • SeaJ
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Coming to terms with the realities of first past the post is far from fascism. I actively advocate for voting systems that would make third parties viable. Until then, vote progressive in the primaries and send money to progressive candidates in the Democratic party to get them to change their platform. Voting for a different party altogether is not going to change their platform.

  • po-lina-ergi
    link
    fedilink
    281 year ago

    You’d think a guy with a lifetime in politics would understand optics better than this.

    • @sandman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      What do you mean? He knows young democrats will just fall in line no matter what he does because he’s not trump.

      • @shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        And if they don’t, he can count on other Democrats to try and browbeat them and shame them into voting for him no matter what he does, screeching, “But Trump!” as loud as they can.

        He sure is trying his best to make his actions indefensible to as wide a swath of the Democratic electorate as he can, now, and just banking on “Hey, I tossed you a few crumbs, and have you seen the other guy?”

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            They’re very clearly pushing Democrats and especially Biden on this issue.

            If it weren’t for the uncommitted movement I have no doubt that the US would have responded to Iran striking back at Israel.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    There’s definitely something we ask don’t know about the US and Israel. There’s got to be some massive secret. Because there’s no other good explanation.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Israel is the US’s unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Middle East. It’s strategically priceless for US world domination.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Israel is basically where all of the NSA spyware gets developed.

    • @Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Money and an influencial foothold in the Middle East. It’s a secret because power and money are withheld from you and all of us.

      • @Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Settler colonialism has nothing to do with religion.

        Palestine is merely good place for a colony since it’s a bridge between Asia and Africa; israel’s formation used common british colonization tactics [III], with companies literally named “Colonization Commission”, “Jewish Colonial Trust” and the like.

        Theodor Herzl, the founder of “zionism” was a racist who saw it as a rampart of the west in the region.

        “We should there form a portion of a rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism. We should as a neutral State remain in contact with all Europe, which would have to guarantee our existence.” Source [II]

        Only difference now is that the US has been the de facto leader of the imperial core since WW2, no longer UK in Europe. They are thus now israel’s main supporter.

  • @Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    “World’s biggest terrorist organisation supports genocidal sky-fairy worshippers”

    Oh, quelle surprise

  • @Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    We’ve heard this all before, U.S. is now agreeing to supply an endless chain of terrorist engagements in surrounding areas of the states involved. Get ready to hear about rocket seiges and mid city suicide bombings. This is so stupid, worst diplomacy ever.