• @xlash123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    1981 year ago

    Commit 77a294d

    Update maintainer and author info. The other maintainer suddenly disappeared.

    Lmao, that’s putting it lightly.

    • @7eter@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      1171 year ago

      the other maintainer now has a special place:

      Special author: Jia Tan was a co-maintainer in 2022-2024. He and the team behind him inserted a backdoor (CVE-2024-3094) into XZ Utils 5.6.0 and 5.6.1 releases. He suddenly disappeared when this was discovered.

  • @Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Can someone provide a summary on what this means? I thought there were malicious exploits in this. Why is it back up and the perpetrator unbanned?

    • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      701 year ago

      Lasse is the original maintainer of XZ, they have been placed back in their position as sole maintainer.

      “Jia Tan” was the person who slipped the backdoor into XZ and is now banned.

      Lasse has already fixed abd removed the backdoor.

      XZ itself is critical software everyone uses (its one of the main compression/decompression programs used on linux)

      • @Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes but damage seems to be done. Distros are talking or have moved off of it to zstd.

        • Billegh
          link
          fedilink
          181 year ago

          There are some, probably. But any exodus will be slow. Xz isn’t useless because it was dangerous once.

          • @intrepid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            Besides, XZ isn’t the only project in such a danger. Banning doesn’t solve that problem. They need to put in more funding and eyes.

        • Calyhre
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          I would argue this might make xz safer mid-term. So much eyes on it. I’m not familiar with other solutions, but who’s to say the bad actor won’t try a similar trick elsewhere

    • @4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Exploits were removed. Maintainer who committed them still banned. xz is a critical piece of software.

    • Billegh
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      This sounds just like something Jia Tan might say…