• @idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    In the third season of the legend of korra, a group of people try to get rid of a monarchy (which is long established as especially unequal and oppressive) in favor of self government. They also try to get rid of the avatar, because she is an infallible being with incredibly outsized power. I love the avatar universe and get how they needed to fight them, but the group wasn’t wrong

    • @ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      461 year ago

      Even the first season had Amon, the guy that wanted equality between benders and non-benders. At one point we’re even shown that power was cut to a predominantly non-bender neighborhood, and when people went outside to protest to get their power turned back on, they were all rounded up and arrested. Afterwards, when Korra goes and tries to get the people that were arrested set free, she’s told

      All equalist suspects are being detained indefinitely. They’ll be freed if and when the task force deems them no longer a threat.

      Just in case it wasn’t clear enough by that point that non-benders were treated as second class citizens.

      • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        All of the LoK villains were basically correct, and had to be caricatures of their stated beliefs in order to be villains. Amon was one of the better ones IMO though. Zaheer is too unrealistic

    • @paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I’ve been meaning to re-watch Korra, but I remember even the first time I watched it being a bit disappointed in the “enlightened centrism” where they are trying to paint every conflict as pacifists vs extremists.

      I think it’s similar to looking at BioShock 1 and BioShock Infinite. There’s a lot of writers out there who just use politics and ideology as a setting for the conflict rather than actually being central to their message. It’s simply a solid formula to make a villain: take any sort of stance and push it to violent extremes. Comstock is a religious zealot, Andrew Ryan I don’t think ever even mentions spirituality if I remember. Ken Levine’s message in the two games is not about religion, but extremes.

      There are benefits. It makes the villains more nuanced and relatable. It gives the protagonist room for doubt and allows for some of the “good” guys to take on antagonistic roles. But Korra also ends up supporting an oppressive regime, and Booker DeWitt gets shoehorned into fights against the people rebelling against his enemy because… Reasons?

    • VaultBoyNewVegas
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you’re talking about Kuvira you should read the comics that take place after the show. My feelings on Kuvira became much more mixed as I ended up sympathizing with her after finishing them.

      • JowlesMcGee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        He’s talking about Zaheer and the Red Lotus. They were extremely well intentioned, but set about their goals with violence.

    • Dandroid
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think what made that group such good villains is that you could definitely see their point of view. That said, they left behind a TON of collateral damage, and they didn’t seem to care that innocent people, including children, died in their wake everywhere they went. They were terrorists that happened to have a noble cause.

    • @xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      No they definitely were bad guys. You cant try to murder someone just because they were born as a specific person you dont like and be good guys. And they didnt differentiate between the Earth queen and any other ruler. Their ideology when it came down to it, was indefensible trash.

  • @paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    351 year ago

    Pokemon Sword and Shield.

    Rose is trying to move the country off of fossil fuels and onto sustainable green energy. Somehow Gamefreak manages to portray this as being a terrorist and extremist. How dare he try to move Galar away from coal?

    • Karu 🐲
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I mean, he did recreate a cataclysmic event in the process, and the projected crisis was bound to happen in 1000 years… One can never be too prepared I guess.

      What is that even trying to say? That there is such thing as going too far when fighting the energy crisis? lol

      • @otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        What is that even trying to say? That there is such thing as going too far when fighting the energy crisis? lol

        Game Freak’s writing team is invested in oil and coal, lol

  • @Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    Not exactly a story. I just watched Babylon 5, and it’s fascinating how the good guys are the bad guys are the good guys are the bad guys…

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      What bad guys are good guys? The reverse is obviously Vorlons.

      • @Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        No bad guys are good guys. And most good guys are not good guys, either.

        The Shadows, the Centauri and the PSI Corps are introduced as “bad guys” but gain a lot of positive aspects during the show without becoming “good guys”. The Nightwatch and the Earth Governement under president Clark are “bad guys” – but quite a few of there supporters/members become important “good” characters, like Zach Allan, Elizabeth Lochley or Susanna Luchenko.

        That’s my point about the Babylon 5 series – they deconstruct the good guy/bad guy meme. Mostly.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Centauri got positive aspects? Londo personally, maybe, but not the Centauri. Psi cops as well did not become better, but more like “even bad people have feelings” type of thing.

      • @xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        Jerry antagonized Tom into attacking him more often than not. He viewed it as a game rather than a life or death struggle. Tom OTOH would be kicked out on the street if he didn’t try to keep Jerry under control.

        • @cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I bet its that Jerry has that toxoplasmosis making him unafraid of cats. In that light, nobody’s at fault. Its just nature shit happening to play out in the domestic sphere

  • @Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Does Dr Doom count for this? He believes he’s seen humanity perish in every reality except the one where he becomes the absolute ruler.

  • @rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    281 year ago

    Voyager kinda fucks with my ability to set spoiler tags, so here is your Spoiler Warning.

    The Cabin in the Woods (even tho the organisation is run by complete assholes, they also happen to postpone the end of the word)

    Mass Effect series (the Geth are actually ok having peace with everyone. They just happen to be in a civil war with Reaper worshippers)

    Witcher 2 (Letho turns out to be the good guy)

    Wanted (the father turns out to be the good guy)

    Battlestar Galactica 2004 series (yes, the Cylons enacted the nuclear holocaust on humanity, but there is a case to be made that the vast majority of them have been manipulated by a faction of ancient Cylons, which leads to a civil war later in the show)

    • daddyjones
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      Snape was never a good guy though. Very brave, yes and he had some good qualities. He was also vindictive and a bully - willing to put his petty dislikes above the quality of his teaching.

      • @turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        441 year ago

        He was also vindictive and a bully

        I formed the impression that James Potter and his gang were the real bullies, and Snape is a tragic character traumatized by their bullying.

          • @turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The book strongly implies that Snape turns into a horrible person as a direct consequence of James Potter’s bullying. He seems to be a nice kid before that.

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Remember that we see this scene through Snape’s memories - something wizards are able to distort to varying degrees.

          It may well be that we aren’t seeing the full story. It is revealed later that tit-for-tat behaviour was quite common to the both of them.

      • @illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        Snape was a good guy, in a sense of oposing the bad guy.

        He was however not a good guy in a sense of being at least a decent human being.

  • @Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kill la Kill, at least with the primary antagonist as the main villain isn’t really introduced until pretty late in the story.