Today i was doing the daily ritual of looking at distrowatch. Todays reveiw section was about a termal called warp, it has built in AI for recomendations and correction for commands (like zhs and nushell). You can also as a chatbot for help. I think its a neat conscept however the security is what makes me a bit skittish. They say the dont collect data and you can check it aswell as opt out. But the idea of a terminal being read by an Ai makes me hesitant aswell as a account needed to use warp. What do you guys think?

    • @BOFH666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      Totally agree. People using cli are probably more skilled and their knowledge has been fed into these ai models.

      So we will all end up with some mediocre level of knowledge, because the next input for the LLM 's will be more of the some old stuff. Flattening the curve and less innovation and smart ideas.

      These kind of “solutions” are for a non existing problem. Looking at the investors, this is only about making money.

  • @lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    AI that can auto generate all those command line arguments I keep forgetting? Sure.

    Closed source terminal that requires account? No way.

    • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      And also, like… Data privacy… My terminal commands and command outputs contain sensitive data. Even company sensitive data. I don’t want to be liable.

  • @Trent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Absolutely not. And they can fuck right off with that whole needing an account to use a terminal thing.

  • @harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    I have zero interest in having AI in my terminal. And needing an account to even use warp is a non starter for me.

  • setVeryLoud(true);
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    I’m neutral towards AI, what I can’t wrap my head around is forcing users to sign in / sign up to use offline apps. Fuck you too, Postman.

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    The terminal seems like the very last place I’d want A.I. I’m usually using it specifically to be precise and don’t just run commands I don’t understand. If you forget some long command, just use history |grep whatever and see what it was. (And then turn it into an alias or function.)

    • @harsh3466@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Exactly. I generally like typing out my commands because I’m learning and it helps me remember what I’m doing and what the commands mean/how they work. And if it’s a particularly long one I’ll make an alias for it.

    • @NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      What the terminal needs is better discoverability. Maybe command recommendation if it isn’t going to hallucinate flags and paths that don’t exist. All this bullshit is just some company trying to capitalize on that desire.

  • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Here’s my opinion. This terminal app is inefficient as fuck. I feel like it’s too much bloat for what a terminal should be. She’ll Completions have existed since forever, I don’t get what’s bringing new with that. And all these AI’s that just resell chatgpt are getting expensive. "Please pay me 10$ a month to have OpenAI in your " . If I were to activate all the AI subscriptions in all the apps I use it would go over 100$. If I need ChatGPT I will just go on their website and get it from there. It’s even cheaper that way, 20$ for unlimited use.

    • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      And also sharing info with your team THROUGH THE TERMINAL? WHAT KINDA SHIT IS THAT. That should be documentation in THE REPOSITORY, IN THE PROJECT. You’re just fragmenting information, and it’s going to make it harder for you to keep it up to date and for people to find it.

      • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        And… I don’t want to force on my team “hey you have to use this terminal otherwise you won’t have the info”. I feel like with this I would be encroaching on their personal space and way of using their computer.

    • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I feel like all these apps with OpenAI ask me to pay just so I don’t have to manually copy and paste to the ChatGPT website. Oh please…

    • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And also like “workflows” just get yourself a makefile or a task file and now you can reuse your “workflows” in any terminal, shell or environment.

  • Yuumi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I don’t like generative AI in my tools. The little prompt that explains a command and arguments that can be passed as you type is nice, I will give it that, but AI should not be any part of it. Fuck right off with it.

  • @Fisch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I don’t know what AI could bring to the table in this case that you can’t do without it already. Command completions or fixing typos works without using AI. If there was an actual benefit, I’d be open to try it out but only by using an open source LLM running locally. I’m definitely not creating an account and paying a monthly subscription while not even being able to use it offline.