@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1351arrow-down17cross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up1344arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.world
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.