@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1351arrow-down17cross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up1344arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.world
minus-square@interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilink2•2 years agoNot having kids affects how rich you are ?
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.