ssillyssadass to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agoIf we discover the means to travel faster than light, but researching and developing the technology means that the Earth is destroyed in just a few decades, should the technology still be pursued?message-square25fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up127arrow-down1message-squareIf we discover the means to travel faster than light, but researching and developing the technology means that the Earth is destroyed in just a few decades, should the technology still be pursued?ssillyssadass to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaressillyssadassOPlinkfedilink1•2 years agoWell the term faster-than-light does usually imply that it’s faster than light
minus-square@banana_meccanica@feddit.itlinkfedilink1•2 years agoIt seemed right to repeat it, because the speed limit of light is impossible to exceed.
Well the term faster-than-light does usually imply that it’s faster than light
It seemed right to repeat it, because the speed limit of light is impossible to exceed.