• @andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    55
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m in a comment war with a nicotine denialist on here now!

    In the 90s, there were still tons of people angry about seat belt laws. It’s every American’s God Given Right to fly out of the windshield and probably kill someone else.

        • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          As a left libertarian, I have a hard time arguing against seatbelt laws. As in, I know they aren’t consistent with my ideology, but the outcomes of having these laws are so much better than not having them. The only thing that I can say against them is that they’re one of the more commonly used bullshit pretexts for initiating traffic stops. I rationalize this trade off and violation of ideals by pointing out that the government has created a fucked up transportation market by enforcing car centrism, and until we can unfuck that, we need to deal with the side effects.

          • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            183 days ago

            I think the argument is more about the impact on others. If you aren’t wearing a seatbelt, you become a projectile that can harm others - both in your car and outside of your car.

            In general, I agree that ideologically it’s a little uncomfortable to dictate personal choices, but when it comes to road safety I think the government has reasonable grounds to enforce certain expectations (same with things like insurance.)

            It is uncomfortable to give police more pretenses to stop people but road safety perhaps is one of those things we could have a hypothetical “good police force” take care of.

            • @shottymcb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              73 days ago

              Government dictating that citizens MUST give money to a private company who then gives money to the politicians who make that mandate is wildly immoral. Insurance should be a government program.

              • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                23 days ago

                Insurance as a whole should be a sort of “public union” thing. No profit motive, everyone who participates in something like driving has to pay some fee for insurance, maybe along with things like registration. Ideally along with massive improvements to public transit.

                The concept of private insurance under capitalism seems at odds with itself. You have to pay out a good chunk less then you take in to turn a profit, and the best way to do that is be useless and fuck over your customers. (With health - Cigna was supposed to cover my top surgery. Pay for it up front be reimbursed reimbursed later. Then, later, it turns out that my employer specifically included a rider that excluded it. I’ve talked elsewhere about how I’ve paid CareCredit back.)

                I don’t know if we should nationalize auto insurance without doing health insurance first though. Would the government be negotiating deals with mechanics? I think hospitals have structures that are easier to unionize and generally smarter/kinder folks than the general population. Mechanics tend to skew the type that’d get upset over navigating fender bender payouts with Uncle Sam, probably going to be harder to get to understand that their labor rights are good things.

            • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              23 days ago

              Ehhhh… Traffic stops are more often than not excuses to fish for other, more serious violations or initiate a civil asset forfeiture. It’s actually one of the big reasons I’m hugely pro-transit and anti-car-centrism, because it robs the state of a huge excuse for initiating police contacts.

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          My step dad had like 4 or 5 DUIs. When I was in elementary school, me and my siblings would get the privilege of “helping” start the car by showing how awesome we were at breathing!

          Like, if you can afford the lawyers and come off as the right kind of good ol’ boy it doesn’t seem to matter. I think at one point he got weekend prison. He’d drive us to school with a high ball sitting in the center console.

          • @BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            23 days ago

            Lot of people in my town with “party plates”. Yellow plate with red letters to signal to cops that you are a frequent DUI fiend. No clue how youend up with those instead of just having your license revoked

    • @Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      74 days ago

      Real men aren’t held back by anything! The belt restricts blood flow through the body! It’s a globalist conspiracy to turn our men into women!

      • @Cargon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        13 days ago

        Imagine having a heart so weak that a little piece of fabric over your chest restricts your blood flow.

    • @Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13 days ago

      I am evil for this and I admit it.
      Seat belts laws should not be enforced on adults. A windshield dive is a good cure for stupid, I bet a lot of MAGA would literally go out like that.

      • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        53 days ago

        Trauma, potential physical harm to others. A whole set of reasons they should be enforced. I get what you’re saying though.

        • @Wilco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Oh, I know it’s a bad point of view. In my defense I live in a no motorcycle helmet state. As long as you carry the insurance for it.