So Caleb Maupin is now labelled a Nazbol. That seems to be the newest buzzword that means ‘bad person’ And i say that, because if you go look at the comments, not one person mentions anything that he did that is nazbol-ish.

And now Thought Slime, the Serfs, and now apparently Luna Oi, and Noncompete are attacking or cancelling or cutting ties with him.

So, opinions? On Caleb, or the others?

I value your opinion as communists, because something similar happened to me, involving alleged communists.

  • @Augustus@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I read a tweet a while back that went “tankies have no power: all the best youtubers are varying shades of anarchists”

    Which just about summed up their entire petit-bourgeois, individualistic and faux revolutionary world view

    If youre not in a communist party then you have no political power anyway and no amount of youtube celebrity (only a slight step up from Youtube comments) is going to change that

    Im sure there is a definitive question of who is right and wrong in this ‘struggle’ to which i reply they are both worse

    • @Azirahael@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      04 years ago

      Which just about summed up their entire petit-bourgeois, individualistic and faux revolutionary world view

      That sure clarifies things. Thanks.

      • @Augustus@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -14 years ago

        So i googled the first on your list as i had a bet with myself hes plugging a patreon like so many other ‘left’ grifters

        Oh what a surprise

        • @veganarkiddie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          04 years ago

          Workers should be compensated for their labor. Yes, that means that communist and anarchist YouTubers could, and I think, should, have Patreons. Especially if you refuse to run ads, which Thought Slime does.

          How are you supposed to make leftist content? Running ads? That seems hypocritical. Working a day job? That’s fine, but you’ll but have less time to make content. Honestly I think Patreon is probably the best way because everyone gets the content for free, the creator gets compensated for their labor.

          Of course, once we live in a classless, moneyless, stateless society, then the conversation would be different, but YouTubers got rent due every month, too.

          • @Augustus@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            04 years ago

            Ive got no problem with anarchists or communists being paid for their labour

            But in the workers movement there has always been a petit bourgeois strata that has always wanted to make a ‘living off being a marxist’ and in doing so set about organising their life about selling their petit booj views out in a book (or YouTube channel in this case)

            My comments in this thread is only to say that people shouldnt care what these people say and if they were serious about organising for socialism they would organise within their communist party, funnel their funds to their communist party and seek an average workers wage from their communist party like…Communists always have

            It speaks to their individualism that they dont

            And thats fine…but communists shouldnt take them seriously

            • @veganarkiddie@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              04 years ago

              I just think people should be evaluated by what they say. Like, I tried looking up Michael Parenti’s net worth, and it seems to be somewhere upwards of a million? Although I only found two sites that gave a number without me enabling javascript, so idk how reliable that stuff is. One site said $1 million, another said $8 million, I dunno, it’s a lot, whatever the number happens to be. And I don’t mean to elevate thought slime to same level as Parenti, or equate book sales to Patreon subscriptions, so this is a very loose analogy, but the point is: people can make bank and still be worth listening to. Not all the time, but Michael Parenti shows that it’s true at least once. I just find it distasteful to screenshot someone’s patreon links to discount them. Whether or not someone is a grifter should be determined by their words and actions, not just their income. But being wary of grifters is good.

                • @veganarkiddie@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  I mean, he doesn’t ask for donations, but also he doesn’t give out his books for free. (Unless he does, if so, lemme know, because I want a physical copy but don’t very much want to pay for one)

                  Do you think a better model for monetizing content would be to put videos behind a paywall? To make the analogy more 1:1 with book sales. From an ethical perspective, I mean. I think you’re likely to make less money by charging for videos than giving them out for free and asking for donations.