Lemmy.world has not defederated lemmy.ml

You should edit your post; you’re spreading disinformation.

Bought Chivalry 2 last knight. Man that’s a blast. I must have had my head cut off at least 4 times in an hour!

Gotta choose progressively smaller instances until you self-host.

Easy Lentil Curry is my go to. It’s delicious and so straightforward.

Have you tried Liftoff? Way better than Connect or Jerboa in my opinion.

I never see Liftoff recommended in these kinds of threads. It’s my favourite app so far out of Thunder, Connect, and Jerboa.

Think you missed a couple of zeroes off that tax number buddy.

Ah, sorry - thank you!

I did try that but I need to replace my screen protector in that segment, so my taps just didn’t register before.

Thank god for Karma.

Bear in mind that graph that I copied overlaps more due to it being relative to high-meat diets (hence no error bars on that group).

The supplementary data shows much less overlap of 95% confidence intervals.

This seems needlessly pedantic, presumably because of a similar argument as the other commenter - that veganism is a philosophy and not just a diet. However, as the other commenter highlighted, veganism begets a vegan diet.

You also don’t have to follow an entirely vegan philosophy to follow a strict vegan diet.

Not to mention “100% plant based” implies you don’t eat fungi!

The study is about diets and their consequent impact on GHG. Why does it matter that it’s not about philosophy?

the UK do this as well

They do?

Well shit, they do! Shame they don’t actually tell you about it actively - as you said, they probably don’t want most people to realise.

Classic Conservative tactic.

“Evil, stupid, greedy-” stuffs pockets “-jobless, welfare scroungers!” stuffs pockets “Pensioners, vote for me to bring down our welfare spending!”

Eh, cows are the biggest contributor but all ruminants are applicable as another poster highlighted.

Also the study does include fish eaters too, as a separate dietary category.

For anyone interested, high-meat diet was defined as >100g meat per day.

Never mind the fact cows release methane which is 25 times more warming than CO².

I’m not really sure the point your trying to make here.

No, the title is correct as far as I can tell from quickly skimming the actual Nature article.

Unrelated rant - I hate the fact independent.co.uk hyperlinks the word ‘study’ which just searches it’s own site for the fucking word ‘study’ rather than linking to the actual source data. Fucking shitstain practices.

I found the original article by plugging the independent article into ground.news. Fucking love that website.

Edit: what’s more is that it’s eating more than 100g of meat per day is 4 times more GHG than eating vegan. Eating <50g per day is about 2 times more than veganism.

YOU. You’re the reason I had to endure that unending two day borefest! /jk

OP’s image needs to be captioned with your comment and then ever so slightly jpegified. chef’s kiss