• 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 4th, 2023

help-circle




  • "The Open Book is my long-standing attempt to design a comprehensible and accessible e-book reader that you can build yourself (or at least have manufactured affordably). The current edition is something I’m calling the “Abridged” or “Developer Preview” edition. It’s designed to be incredibly simple: there are 7 through-hole and 14 surface mount components, nearly all in a chunky 1206 package that’s easy to hand solder. The tradeoff is that it has no LiPo charging circuit; instead it uses AAA batteries, making it a bit more chunky than previous versions of the book.

    The goal with this version is to get hardware in hands so we can start hacking on firmware."

    https://www.oddlyspecificobjects.com/projects/openbook/

    So:

    • This is a hobby / project of love
    • The current focus is on hardware

    I’m sure that the eventual plan is to support ePub.

    I’m not sure it will ever get there, because it’s not a well resourced project, but I personally don’t like criticizing one person’s efforts, which they are making freely available.






  • Or you can recruit heavily in areas where folks are disadvantaged and have few options, dangling education in front of them in exchange for being willing to kill or die for you.

    This is absolutely what we do in the U.S. and it’s abhorrent.

    I guess what I want is for nobody to be so desperate for their basic needs that they feel compelled to kill and die in war.

    And if we had a country that cared for all of its citizens and didn’t start wars of aggression, maybe more people would want to enlist as they have real values to protect and have a reasonable expectation that they won’t be committing atrocities?

    Honestly not a criticism of you or your comment. Lot’s of people are advocating for the same thing; You just said it plainly.

    …Anyway, this is all terrible and we absolutely can do better, starting with building community locally, mutual aid, protesting, and listening to marginalized and oppressed people’s.





  • A concrete example of this is doctors and hospitals creating guidelines about how to triage care when ICUs were/are full because of unmitigated spread of COVID.

    It is definitely an “interesting” phylisophical question to ask:

    “If a long term ventilator user comes into the ICU, with the ventilator they own and brought from home, and they are less likely to survive than an otherwise healthy young man who needs a respirator due to COVID infection, is the morally best choice to steal the disabled person’s ventilator (killing them) and use it to save the young man’s life?”

    The policy question that should be asked instead, and never really ways, is “How do we make sure that we never get to the point where we have so many people in the ICU from a preventable disease that we run out of respirators and need to start choosing who to let die?”

    This is not just a hypothetical question:

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/long-term-ventilator-users-lose-bid-revive-suit-over-ny-emergency-guidelines-2022-11-23/

    Disabled people continue to plead with us for the bare minimum, like requiring doctors who work with immunocompromised patients to wear N95 respirators while treating those patients.

    We continue to chose to stack more people on both sets of tracks instead.


  • I agree with everything you said in your comment, but it seems like an odd response to this particular meme.

    In this meme we have the same person saying two things:

    1. You can’t use Norway as an example of Socialism being successful because it’s not really socialism.

    2. We can’t have social safety nets in our country (probably the U.S. in this case) because that would be socialism, and socialism doesn’t work.

    That person is not interested in helping reduce exploitation and preventing needless suffering.

    That person is not arguing in good faith.