Why the f#ck do they still need to clarify it was once a good site . X remember I used to be Twitter.
- Huh?
- It’s formerly
- Twitter was never a “good site”, it’s always been a cesspool
deleted by creator
X is a confusing name, and news articles want to write clear content. That is all.
Just more of a middle aged man being an edgelord.
Because “X” is ambiguous and basically meaningless. They are clarifying that they are talking about the company that used to be Twitter instead of any of the other 1,000,000 things called X.
Sir, this is
a Wendy’s!technologyIt’s an invasion. Severe aggression from Mildly Infuriating.
For me Twitter died shortly after Musk took over. It’s fitting that he renamed it - because it’s not the same place anymore.
I believe it was about the time that musk threw a fit the news was still calling it Twitter and threatened to take action. I’m pretty sure they’re calling it that now just to piss him off
They’ve been writing “X, formerly Twitter” in news articles since the day he announced it. Also was “Twitter, currently rebranding to X” for the first week.
Because “X” means X.org for about 40 years now.
Can’t wait for Twitter (formerly X (formerly Twitter)) to come.
In Finnish media they’re usually calling it “viestipalvelu X” roughly translating to “messaging service X” but it’s not uncommon for them to include that it used to be called twitter.
