Historically, the relationship between the US and Israel is far closer than others in the region. Everyone else are much more like fair weather friends. Intelligence between the two is highly integrated to a degree unseen outside of the closest US allies.

“The United States is decimating the radical Iranian regime’s military in a way the world has never seen before,”

he said, masturbating furiously.

Can someone please make this creep take a cold shower before doing these briefings?

Okay archive.today is just dead set on being completely useless today. The main link is a gift link now.

Your mom’s an undisclosed bot.

I posted this before archive today was finished, just removing “/wip” from the url but archive today failed. It’s been dogshit for the past few days for some reason. Generating a new link now and I’ll update it when it’s done. Thanks for letting me know it was broken.

It’s not primarily to do with Israel, which is what headlines are about. A headline about Israel invading would be misleading. You’d expect an article about Israel invading and not one about the Lebanese government’s efforts to disentangle itself from Hezbollah.

Why are you even arguing this? You didn’t read the article. You incorrectly assumed it was about something it isn’t. Like, those amateur NYT editors just haven’t stumbled upon the brilliant headline writing method of making shit up without reading anything? What are you talking about.

The article is about the internal politics of Lebanon.

1. This isn’t an article about Israel invading a country.

2. “Israel” appears in the article 27 times (once in the post body, even!), including this sentence that also includes “invaded”:

Israeli forces have also invaded and seized parts of southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah militants have engaged them in clashes over the past two days.

Right?

‘If you agree to everything we want and nothing you want… that’s the kind of deal we can get behind!’

Thanks!

I wasn’t attacking you. You took issue with the language used and I didn’t understand why. Still don’t – it seems like a common way to describe a common occurrence to me – but you don’t have to explain it if you don’t want to.

https://archive.is/fELBv

I dunno, seems like a perfectly fine way to describe what he was doing. What’s your issue with it?

He wasn’t diversifying trade in his speech at Davos, even if that was ultimately his goal.

We shouldn’t downplay it by calling it a Chinese outlet like it’s news. It’s Chinese state propaganda.

We should use the good source you cited instead of letting this Trojan horse through the gate.

Get thee to mildly infuriating, you scoundrel!

This is some serious mission creep from the ‘slam’ weirdo community.

Probably nothing. What could he promise?

Given Denmark and Greenland seem to not have any idea what he’s talking about, this is most likely Trump caving and still trying to get a “Victory!” headline.

That’s not an effective test of whether this works. So no thank you, dear.

“Moderately confident”
“This is a BETA feature”

It’s like Kyiv/Kiev. Chernobyl is Russian; Chornobyl is Ukrainian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl#Etymology

Macron, call sign Maverick. I don’t know if not looking like you could buzz the tower at any given moment is technically a medical condition but the glasses are working.