• Blackout
    link
    fedilink
    2792 years ago

    no cost

    I think the head of a CEO somewhere just exploded.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    1172 years ago

    With this being a free service, I feel like calling it NASA+ is a bit misleading. To me, I feel like the “+” indicates a paid, premium service. If it wasn’t for the title of this post that clarifies that it’s free, I probably wouldn’t have even considered installing the app based on the name, alone.

    Either way, this is great news! I’m probably gonna check this out once it’s available. I wish they’d have a release date, though. The official page just says “Coming soon”.

    • MysticKetchup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      672 years ago

      Feels very much like they’re just following the trend of a bunch of streaming services that just add a + to the end. As long as it’s good though I don’t think it matters much

    • @DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      It may mean, NASA content plus other content they feel is appropriate to the service.

      I don’t usually think “paid service” when I see the plus symbol added to something.

  • @IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    922 years ago

    I posted on Lemmy about needing recommendations for movies to watch on shrooms…and then minutes later stumble across this article.

    Talk about perfect timing, lol.

    This is really starting to feel like a perfect replacement for that…other website.

  • @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 years ago

    NASA+ will be available on most major platforms via the NASA App on iOS and Android mobile and tablet devices; streaming media players such as, Roku, Apple TV, and Fire TV; and on the web across desktop and mobile devices.

    What’s the betting it won’t be on LG’s WebOS though? 😭

          • LUHG
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            Usually yes, Plex is slow as shit but honestly iPlayer is still fantastic even on a b7 2017 oled.

            • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              That’s good; it stopped working on my aunt and uncle’s Sony (although I guess it’s a bit old now, it still works well) so had to get them a Fire stick instead.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        Get a streaming stick. The hardware TV manufacturers use to run their OS is generally bottom of the barrel and is sluggish as hell.

      • appel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Their OLED panels are top notch, so don’t sleep on it. Just get a separate streaming device as the experience on Roku, Android TV and Apple TV is just miles better.

      • thanevim
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        As others have said, don’t buy TVs for their smart features. Just use a streaming stick. They are easier to replace as software changes, and there’s practically no real benefit to ever putting a TV online in the first place.

        Also, LG panels are the best visual quality. You’re doing good going the LG route. Just keep it offline.

      • @slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        LG OLEDs are amazing, worth the price. Their OS is also very good compared to other TVs, I used it for years without an outside player. Now I have an Apple TV, which is better, but I still miss the LG’s magic controller.

    • MrScottyTay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I bit the bullet and got a Google tv with Chromecast because webos always gets left behind (and there was no homebrew YouTube alternative like smarttube on it)

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        342 years ago

        Not only is it not allowed to be DRM’d, “US government IP” is itself an oxymoron: stuff published by the government is Public Domain, so it doesn’t even count as “intellectual property [sic]” to begin with.

        • @maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Edit: I realize from the replies that my point was off base and actually opposite of the debate here. I’m going to leave this in its place, but thanks to the responders that showed me this wasn’t the right place to make the point I was trying to.

          • @RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Govt research grants are not videos literally being published by the govt. They aren’t particularly comparable siuations. It’s why I can’t just buy a stock of Disney and suddenly have free access to their IP. Meanwhile I can rehost whole programs put out by NASA with zero issue.

            I get the anger and it’s justified, but man is it misdirected here.

    • @gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      372 years ago

      Most NASA stuff is published under non affiliation free use license - you can do what ever you like with it.

    • @Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a majority of the content is already freely downloadable from somewhere…

      • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        402 years ago

        A budget that goes into space exploration, development of groundbreaking science that has its use both in space and on Earth, popularization of science among masses, democratizing access to cutting-edge knowledge, making it free for everyone, including kids and the poor, to access at any time? Yes, please.

        • a Kendrick fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -212 years ago

          Especially if you don’t live in the shitty country. Yes please, sacrifice the physical and mental wellbeing of Americans for an indepth knowledge of the Universe just before you regress into full facism. Your war crimes won’t be overlooked though.

          • DarkenLM
            link
            fedilink
            222 years ago

            I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

            I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…

            • @jayandp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              92 years ago

              Seriously, I’m always confused by people complaining about NASA’s budget. It’s peanuts in comparison to the other stuff our Government wastes money on. Also doesn’t help that the government itself is responsible for a lot of the money wasting that happens at NASA. The Artemis program being the perfect example, which is basically just a glorified jobs program at this point, as mandated by the government, instead of actually being a smart way of building a rocket.

              • @gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                US americans are complaining for nasa, public schools if they don’t have kids, public health sector, even for bike lanes because they use no bikes, but almost never for all the military expenses on the other side of the earth.

                • @flerp@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  People who are so uneducated that they think funding public education is a bad investment are great proof of why we need better public education…

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            NASA isn’t sacrificing American’s wellbeing, regressing into fascism, or committing war crimes. That’s multiple other branches of the government. Despite whatever media you’re consuming the US gov isn’t one unified dictatorship, as much as a certain political group would like it to be.

            NASA is one of the few branches of our government that’s actually somewhat decent and doesn’t need a complete overhaul to benefit our country or world. It’s already paying us back the relatively small budget allocated to them in several ways. So your comment is basically a whataboutism.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -82 years ago

              Probably true to some extent. Though, at what point do you decide it’s better to just directly give the money to people?

              • themeatbridge
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                There’s no situation where it isn’t better to just give the money directly to the people who need it.

              • @flerp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Considering it is such a small percentage of the budget and they have developed so much useful technology (https://www.howtogeek.com/831363/these-nasa-innovations-are-all-around-us-everyday/)

                I would say, take the money from other things that suck, like handouts to the rich and wasteful military overspending which would easily cover the things we need to cover. Defunding NASA would contribute to the dummification of the country and is a terrible idea.

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Considering it is such a small percentage

                  Currently, but during many of the innovations it was a much higher percentage. And why do you assume there wouldn’t be other, maybe more impactful innovations, if NASA money and NASA researchers weren’t working on something else?

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That would be great, but that’s not NASA’s department. Try Congress first. Then the DOD. Edit: and then the morally bankrupt billionaires.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I’m not advocating NASA donate the money, I’m advocating considering cutting NASA’s budget

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Maybe you’s could do a similar thing for healthcare and get healthcare for free, like this new nasa+ thing. Wouldn’t that be wild

        • @UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          But what about the profits of insurance companies that act as gatekeepers to your healthcare?? Are those people just supposed to get different jobs? Bet you didn’t think about who you would be hurting

          Sarcasm

      • @dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The funny thing with tax is you don’t get choose how it’s spent. Tax money is public money that ought to be spent in the public interest, and NASA is a perfectly good example of this. Other good examples are infrastructure, parks, public healthcare and free education. Bad examples of tax expenditure are the ridiculous military complex, massive corporate subsidies and contractors doing poor work that the government should be directly controlling.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    If it’s called NASA Plus, how is it free? The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

    Don’t get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they’re just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn’t be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      772 years ago

      The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

      Notepad++ enters the chat

    • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      Looks like they refer to adding their Science wing into the streaming, too.

      In this crazy capitalist world peiple started forgetting that public services can be free, like, for real :D

        • @lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That goes without saying.

          It’s free for the end consumer and everyone knows that it is paid with taxes. So saying free is just easier.

          • @shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            But the Libertarians always have to say it. Nevermind that anything free from a corporation is paid for though advertising, or selling your data, or folded into the item cost, or future purchases, so by this strict definition that “someone is paying for it” means literally nothing is ever free.

            It has to be said EVERY TIME someone mentions that public services are offered at no charge.

        • @flerp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Everyone knows that… that’s what they mean by free, free to use. Why do you think people don’t know this? Did you just figure it out or something? Are you seriously that slow?

    • @ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 years ago

      I don’t think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It’s like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It’s just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you’ll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

      What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

    • MrScottyTay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      What other “plus” apps have a non plus version though? Stone Disney+ it’s just become “the thing” that streaming services go by now

      • themeatbridge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Disney had a several tv channels and an app that was free for subscribers when they launched Disney+ but I don’t know if they still have the old app.

    • Meowing Thing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Mauve for this you’ll need to have an account? This would already help nasa market products towards you and this is a good value they can get without you paying anything.

  • @Sygheil@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    *Previously on Desperate Spacewives…

    Sam has just kicked out of the airlock apartment by his wife Karen. Would his other woman save him from radiation and lack of oxygen? Tune in to this episode of Desperate Spacewives

    • @PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Are you not familiar with NASA TV? It’s pretty interesting at times with science updates on their exploration programs like the Mars rovers and JWST. They also broadcast EVA’s and have interviews with people working in Mission Control and elsewhere. I like it a lot.

      • @muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -16
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I am familliar i love it damn cool shit and impressive engineering. Its important that while enjoying it that u dont forget its a tool to promote american propoganda and scientific exeptionalism

        • Tarquinn2049
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Space is the only place where Russia and America are friends. Nasa only cares about politics as far as they need to to keep their funding. And even then they generally opt for less politics even when it means less funding.

          • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            The only “politics” NASA plays is to advertise to the public how great the things they’re doing are because the more public support, the more funding they get.

            And nobody should be against that. Everything NASA does is toward scientific progress. The amazing things they’ve done on their miniscule budget should be lauded and they should be given a much higher proportion of the US budget than they are currently afforded.